andrew_pastore Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 Ok, I have seen this alot lately. Forgive me, but I have no idea on this one. Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin conville Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 google bokeh and click on the first item Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neilb Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 background blur. <P> some lenses are said to produce nicer bokeh than others. Usually it's the faster lenses. This is the context bokeh is usually discussed in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew_pastore Posted November 2, 2005 Author Share Posted November 2, 2005 HMM, I thought it was some sort of abbrivation. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppyDigs Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 Historically, English speakers love to "borrow" words from other languages. Someday bokeh will be on the tip of every American's tongue, proudly spoken along side other adopted words such as karaoke, tomato and resumé! Until then, my American Hertitage Dictionary will suffer a great void. Sometimes the light’s all shining on me. Other times I can barely see. - Robert Hunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_cole Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 FYI: The American Heritage Dictionary may be the best looking dictionary ever, but if you want function you need to investigate the Oxford New American Dictionary 2nd Ed. Look up a few words like fyord, Bokeh (yes it is there), and a few others that are dear to you. I think you will like the definitions and the wording used in them much more than AHD. If you do this I would be interested in what you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.W. Wall Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 Vote for Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary. Bob Atkins' site has a blurb explaining bokeh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppyDigs Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 I only like the The American Heritage Dictionary because it installs on my Mac. I rarely open the actual book. I had the Random House Unabridged but they didn't update the app so it died with OS 9. But one can ever own too many dictionaries... Sometimes the light’s all shining on me. Other times I can barely see. - Robert Hunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andrew_ito Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 Japanese derivative. Boke-teru refers to being blurry or out of focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oceanphysics Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 dictionary.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eos 10 fan Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh FWIW: I like www.onelook.com - It searches more than 5 million words in more than 900 online dictionaries. -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awindsor Posted November 2, 2005 Share Posted November 2, 2005 I use the Oxford English Dictionary. I do not recommend the Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary. My old copy was not even closed under cross referencing; you could look up a word and it would refer you to one which didn't appear in the Collegiate version. Terrible! Jake, what is a fyord ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neild Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 <i>Jake, what is a fyord ?</i><p>Perhaps it is a kind of cyar? ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henrik.ploug Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 In Scandinavia "fyord" is used for fun to mean a word that is improper to use in a given situation. For example "Nikon" would be a fyord in the EOS-forum, and "human rights" would be a fyord in the Bush-administration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 <p> <i> </i> </p> <p> <a href="http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html#bokeh">http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html#bokeh</a> <b></b> </p> <p> <i> </i> </p> <p> <a href="http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/bokeh.html">http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/bokeh.html</a> <b></b> </p> <p> <i> </i> </p> <p> <a href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-04-04-04.shtml">http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-04-04-04.shtml</a> <b></b> </p> <p>Happy shooting, <br> Yakim.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_cole Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 Big Oops! "fyord" -> I meant "fjord". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
www.antiquecameras.net Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 <a href="http://members.aol.com/dcolucci/bokeh.htm">Bokeh Central</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fernando lopez Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 Eh.........what did bokeh mean again? ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markplawchan Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 unfocused..like this thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_r._fulton_jr. Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 I think a photographer could go his/her whole life and not know what bokeh is. I have never heard a photographer of any consequence actually discuss it and most don't know what it is. Like an old tennis ball the dog's been chewiing on it's batted around the Leica forum about once a week. Usually, somebody posts a picture and asks if it has bad bokeh? The answer (they don't want to hear) is that no, it's just a bad picture. Stop blaming the lens. Sorry--I'll try to relax and find my meds. :->) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_hicks1 Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 It means "the quality of the out of focus image". Some people are much more sensitive to this than others. The first lens where I heard anyone discuss this (10-15 years ago) was the original Voigtlander Apo Lanthar, but in those days we used the term "quality of the out of focus image". Lenses with REALLY LOUSY bokeh (wiry double images) do look nasty to me, but I have to confess that I've never looked at an image and said, "Wow! Nice bokeh!" Cheers, Roger (www.rogerandfrances.com -- recently revised!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spearhead Posted November 3, 2005 Share Posted November 3, 2005 It's something to talk about when a photograph isn't interesting enough to generate any other discussion. Music and Portraits Blog: Life in Portugal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neild Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 Yes, but for every photo with out-of-focus areas, you can almost always find someone who likes the <i>bokeh</i>... and also someone who does not. It is best IMO to decide yourself if you like it or not, and forget about asking others what they think! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reza motaghedi Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 I love Bokeh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhenry Posted November 4, 2005 Share Posted November 4, 2005 Basically it's the rendition of out-of-focus point of light (generally in the background). It comes from the japanese 'bo-ke' which mean 'fuzziness'. <p>He are some illustrations coming from Ken Rockwell's website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now