Jump to content

My new Holga is far too good. Help, help, help...


Recommended Posts

Evenin', all.

 

I'll get right to it. My new Holga isn't living down to its reputation. I think the designers

have been at it. The film cavity and the cavity it's wound into have foam padding, which I

assume is meant to hold film in place and eliminate the need for stuffing cardboard round

the edges and hoping it'll work. I didn't need a chisel to change the slider from 16 to 12.

There's a mask for 6x6 now: how am I supposed to get that scarred, lo-tech look? I tried

an old exposed test roll and it wound through flawlessly. Twice. Nothing has fallen off.

The instruction book has colour illustrations and it's well written. I've clicked the shutter

maybe 50 times and it still works (famous last words, I know...). It's the super-duper

model with the filters and other stuff and nothing was missing. Even the Holga pics book

by that French guy was included.

 

I read lots about this camera and I feel quite cheated. Where's the 1970s plastic charm?

Where's that feeling of adventure? Where's that feeling of struggle with lousy communist

rubbish? (Although my Praktica never had that either, so maybe I was silly to expect it).

It... just... works... It's not fair. If it delivers focussed and properly exposed photos, I'm

going to ask for a refund. I'm warning you all here and now: prepare to be disappointed.

 

Help me, someone. Was I wrong to expect too little?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe,

<p>

If your new Holga has a B shutter and really produces good pictures, I'd like to trade

my mint Holga 120 SF with yours. It is the same as Holga 120S but with built-in flash

and therefore more expensive. Without flash, it produces the same kind of image as

my 120S.

<p>

You can see the picture of the camera (120SF) in this thread:

<p>

<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00BuxK">

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00BuxK</a>

<p>

Email me if you are interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's a leveling process, all cameras will soon be alike.

the new conmsumer azomms are much worse than the zooms of the 1950's ( and slower , too) p&s have f/5.6 lenses. eventually that will all meet in the middle and they will discontinue film entirely. The say SEE film doesn't work.

only a few of us with yougoslavian film and pre 1970 cameras, with metal bodies and real glass lenses will know the true story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second throught. It seems that you live in another side of the globe from me. The

postal fee could be more expensive than the cameras. It is not worth it.

 

My dream camera is a simple good Holga that can produce images as good as those

form XA or mju-II.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I saw it on Adorama site for $35. Unfortunately, it has a flash and I hate flash

and battery ;-)

 

BTW, I have too many (3!) Holgas already. I don't want to buy another one unless I can

trade/sell my 120SF ;-)

 

It is not about money, it is about space!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry you are dissapointed...I bought a Holga about 3 years ago and it truly is a piece-o-crap. It's great. Sometimes it is my favorite camera, and sometimes I can't be bothered...but it remains in the rotation. Maybe you should keep an eye out on eBay for a Diana. They don't get any worse than that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought one of the new ones a few weeks ago. I painted the inside flat black and velcro'd the back on. I was also impressed (or disapiointed) with how good of a picture it took. With the lens set to infinity, landscape pictues are almost totally in focus throughout the negative. But when set to the close focus, theres plenty of vignetting and blur on the edges. I took it to my own wedding two weeks ago and pulled it out on my bride as she walked down the isle. I now have a priceless black and white of my wife and father in law on our wedding day.

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's the wedding shot of my wife and father-in-law.. I apologize for the horrible quality but I am scannerless. So I decided to take a shot of it with my digital in horrible lighting. The pic is much more detalied and not so yellow. I'll get it scanned later. John<div>00CdLd-24277484.jpg.bfb970e3da235443c80766117797a4a3.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam's pic proves once again that you can't beat a big negative.

 

There is a number of Holga models. I have the 120CFN - the GTi of Holgas. It was an early

birthday present. It came with a tripod socket, does normal or bulb, coloured flash (red,

blue, yellow and normal) and a push-on filter holder for square filters. I assume they're a

proprietary Holga size, but I don't know. The filters are orange, red, yellow and blue. You

also get a set of soft surround filters in red, orange, blue and normal. Using colour flash is

said to have the same effect as using coloured filters. I guess you could mix if you wanted

to! Sam: the Holga works fine without batteries. They're just there for the flash. There's

also a manual, with illustrations and Holga pics; a sheet of instructions (which contradicts

the manual on the subject of which film is best); a wall poster; a softback book of Holga

pics.

 

From my reading, I know there is also a Holga "Woca", which has a glass lens instead of

plastic and which is said to do better quality pics. Or worse, depending on the look you're

trying to achieve. I don't think Holga will ever produce a one-speed Rolleiflex, somehow.

Although it would be fun...

 

I'm about to go out with the camera for the first time. Wish me luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm, Sam? Not to be too obvious, but nothing prevents you from leaving the batteries out or the flash turned off if you get a Holga 120SF (or a CFN, for that matter). The only big gotcha with the 120SF compared to the original 120S is that you can't just leave the mask out (to get nice non-flat film) because it holds the batteries in place -- but if you don't load batteries, you probably could leave the mask out and get all the same charming crap...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Donald, I have three Holgas: 120S, 120SF and Pinholga (made by Randy at

holgamods). I have used 120SF for a while ( see my

<a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/2435442">

subway photos</a>.) But I prefer the weight and feel of 120S because besides the

batteries, which I have to tape after removing the 645 mask, the flash on 120SF itself

also adds a little weight.

<p>

The problem with 120S (and WOCA I believe) is the lack of bulb shutter. That makes

night photography difficult but

<a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/2430728">

not impossible</a>.

<p>

Contrary to most Holga photographers, I shoot Holga not because of its image

quality or "Holga look" but the way I handle the camera itself. For example, in my

latest work on

<a href="http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00CWtL">

Puerto Rican Day Parade</a>, I could have used Rolleiflex

but in such a chaotic environment, it is safer to have a Holga in my hand, film in my

pocket and no camera bag. It provides low profile and mobility. What I lost is

Rolleiflex quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, you bought the OFFICIAL Holga kit. How much you paid for it? I got mine from a Hong Kong shop featured in e-bay for a third of what it cost in the UK (GBP 55), with all the faulty stuff in place, photocopied instructions manual included. Should you start modifying yours until the desired effects turn up? There is plenty of information on the Internet, just google it!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...