peter_yardley Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 A "Fuji Quickchange" holder is for sale on Ebay <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7613159944&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1"> here</a> <p> is it as described an updated Grafmatic? I knew of QuickLoad, but not of Quickchange. sounds pretty good for location work with light weight.<p> Anyone had experience with them? <p> Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capocheny Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Peter, Personally, I'd go with the Fuji Quick Change holder rather than the Grafmatic back. I surmise you'll be buying the Grafmatic back on the used market. They're great when they work properly. The downside to buying them used is that you can end up with a back with septums that aren't flat. Or, the counter doesn't work (which isn't a huge deal though.) At other times, you'll find the mechanism may not be in perfect working order and this can cause jerky movements when loading and unloading film during the shoot. (This was my own experience. When changing to the next sheet of film, it was so jerky that it would cause the filmback to go out... resulting in problem shots.) This is NOT to say that you can't find a perfect specimen but they are pretty hard to find. Having said that, the Grafmatic backs also have a pretty hefty weight to them. So, if you're looking for the lightest weight possible, I'd suggest you consider Fuji Quickloads and either a Fuji holder or a Polaroid 545 film back rather than the Grafmatic back. Just my 2 cents worth! :) Good luck. Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
douglas_pollock1 Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 According to Dirk R�sler at Megaperls Japan Webshop, www.unicircuits.com/shop/, the QuickChange backs and the plastic film cartridge inserts are going out of production. He is still selling them. The plastic inserts can be reloaded but are plastic and will degrade over time. A wonderful system, but users should purchase several film cartridge inserts soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troyammons Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Just the opposite. From what i understand a mint graphmatic might be better. I posted a question about the quickchange system a while back and one user here noted that it light leaked and fogged every piece of film he ever ran through it. He did offer it for sale to me, but after that response I decided to use graphmatics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_graham4 Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Could not disagree more! I own a Quickchange and Grafmatics, and the Grafmatics can leak, have bent septums, and counters that jam. they are also very old by now. The Quickchange has unbendable plastic inserts, works perfectly, is 50% lighter and has 8 shot capacity, rather than 6, and you can swap out mid sequence. its a no brainer. Ken Canham (camera maker and technician par excellence) uses them himself and liked them so much he went to visit the designer in Japan, and then became the US importer when that was possible! You cant get a higher recommendation than that. I would choose them over a Grafmatic any day. Considering that EBay outfit = more than 5 grafmatics, its a bargain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_chee Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 In an old thread of apug.org, I found this link, in case you are interested in how it works. http://www.f32.net/Services/Equipment/Accessories/quickchange.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capocheny Posted April 24, 2006 Share Posted April 24, 2006 Peter, At the current bid of $355 AND with about 9 days left... I think I'd be buying a pile of Toyo 4x5 holders instead! :) Wow! All the more power to the seller! :) Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted April 25, 2006 Share Posted April 25, 2006 16 exposures. Bulletproof. Very light. No darkroom needed to load. You young guys don't know what you've missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_yardley Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 Yes, $350 isn't nothing, but 5 good clean Grafmatics would be around $500, and considering this is much lighter, its doesnt seem a bad price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now