richard_cooper5 Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 I've used Fuji 800 Press for several years with good results in non- NHL rinks (usually shooting 250 at 2.8 or so), but I wonder if anyone has used another 800 speed film that they think might give better grain etc. for larger prints. Thanks for any suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbq Posted April 26, 2005 Share Posted April 26, 2005 Well, you can give NPZ a try. Lots of people will argue that a DSLR would be quite appropriate in such a situation, but it's probably not the answer you're after. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_cooper5 Posted April 27, 2005 Author Share Posted April 27, 2005 No, I use a Nikon F5. Maybe DSLR would be better, but I can't make the switch right now; too many tuitions. But thanks for the suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly_flanigan1 Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 Here I have used 800 color print Fuji in both versions of Hockey for many years; using F2.8 at about 1/250 as a good first guess in exposure. The 4 layer emulsion handles mixed lighing real well. In amateur games; many time rink us less lighting than pro games; ie a bank of lights can might be turned off. Long ago I used Royal-X with a TLR; usually F2. 8 to f4 at 1/125 to 1/250 second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly_flanigan1 Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 Rinks vary alot in brightness and lighting type. Just keeping a dumb notebook for each rink; with what works; the exposure required; is far better than jumping thru a wad of camera brands. If you haved played hockey yourself you have a major advantage; you get a feel for the game; where plays are going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelly_flanigan1 Posted April 27, 2005 Share Posted April 27, 2005 <BR><BR><BR>Fuji 800 print films are great hockey films. They handle mixed lighting well. Experiment with many different cameras; break the rules; dont get stuck in a rut. An MF camera today will make a larger print; but focusing require some experience and many more shots. A DSLR is what most newspapers use. Here is a VGA cellphone image: it got printed in a newspaper!<BR><BR><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y148/ektar/hockey/tripods-361.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com"><BR><BR><BR>This is a 5.5mm 1/112 second image Olympus d360L 1.3 megapixel camera<BR><BR><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y148/ektar/hockey/tripods-169.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com"><BR><BR>This is a Leica M3 shot with a 800 Fuji from walmart; 1/250 @f2.5 10.5cm<BR><BR><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y148/ektar/hockey/tripods-406.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com"><BR><BR>Here is an ancient royal-X Rollie shot at about F2.8 to F4; at F1/125 second<BR><BR><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y148/ektar/hockey/tripods-452.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com"><BR><BR> Here is a cellphone image of SZWEZ being escorted into the sin bin<BR><BR><img src="http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y148/ektar/hockey/tripods-547.jpg" alt="Image hosted by Photobucket.com"><BR><BR><BR> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now