Jump to content

105mm or 135mm Prime for Portrait?


gabri

Recommended Posts

I sold my 105 after geting the 75-150 E Series. I could not see a difference is image

quality in real-life circumstances: printed in newspapers/magazines and in prints up to

11x14. I have had that zoom for going on twenty years now and I have never once missed

the 105...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Gauss formula goes back to about 1970/1971; two generations at least before the AIS version. All AI versions are Gauss. The non AI Nikkor-PC is multicoated; from circa 1973ish; and a modern Gauss version. The lens before that is a Nikkor P; that is single coated; and a Gauss version; from about 1971 onward. This is the exact same lens as todays lens; same lens formula; only in single coated optics. These lenses have a larger rear element. Prior to about 1970/1971;, the Nikkor 105mm as a Sonnar design; which is the same as the 10.5cm F2.5 in the Nikon rangefinder; and LTM Nikkor. These are about theame at infinity; and abit less sharp closer than 2 to 3 meters. For a portrait; bothe Sonnar and Gauss versions are great.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the best values is the 1973ish 105mm PC Nikkor. It is multicoated; and the modern Gauss version. Some were even factory modified to AI. In movie work; this version is liked by some over the AI and AIS versions; due to the big flutes and rugged mount. The AI and AIS versions have a rubberized ring; with NO improvement at all in optics. because so many folks mention "get a AIS or AI version"; the PC Nikkor often goes cheap. I got a spare last year for 35 dollars on Ebay.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...