Jump to content

Sample Pix of C/V 75/2.5 (Wide Open and Stopped Down)


Recommended Posts

This <a target="_blank" href="http://www.photo.net/photo/2574258">

one</a> is taken at f/2.5. These two were taken at f/2.8, not really wide open: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.photo.net/photo/2445500">

one</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.photo.net/photo/2556124">

two</a>

<p>

Obviously those photos are too small to see the lens sharpness. No photos taken with the lens stopped down since I don't really like photos with everything in focus.

<p>

How it handles on the street? Pretty hard to focus with Bessa R2 unless you use the lens at f/8 or even slower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stefano

 

Quite honestly, this is one of the lenses I reach for when taking portraits. The performance is pretty good wide open. It has a very pleasing bokeh to it. While I don't have anything to post, I have taken some of my favorite snaps of my kids with this lense. It is inexpensive by leica standards and easy to use.

 

Eric

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also will recommend the 75 Heliar. It produces excellent images as seen above. I will also repeat the concern though that if you are using a Bessa R or R2 body, it does take an effort to focus up close and wide open. That is a function of the camera though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stefano, this lens is indeed very nice. It produces pleasing bokeh (according to my eyes) and its size/weight is just perfect. Sharpness, well I never use tripod with this lens and I don't shoot Kodak Tech Pan either but so far I have no complaints.

<p>

Focusing and framing with Bessa R2 are rather challenging. I'd be much happier with Canon EF85/1.8 with its ring USM if size isn't taken into account.

<p>

Will I recommend this lens? Yes if you can take time carefully focusing or you will take photos with the lens stopped down. No if you want to snap into focus quickly of a moving subject especially when used wide open.

<p>

HTH, Kris.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried using the 75 on a CL with 90 framelines. Too much like hard work.

Focusing was diffficult with the CL - more because of the small rangefinder

patch, rather than the narrow base. In the end got rid of it for an Elmar C... and

bought a Nikkor 85 AIS, which in comparison is blissful. Use the Nikon when I

KNOW i'm taking portraits, and take the CL/ELmar just on the off-chance. <p>

Although I never took one good photo with it, construction of the VC was

great, and it was nice and compact. If I had an M, with 75 framelines, I'd

consider trying one again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been using the CV 75/2.5 Color-Heliar with a Bessa R2, and also with a Bessa T and the CV 75mm external viewfinder. I don't have any good examples ready to post, but I am extremely pleased with the lens (not only on its own merits, but also for the price).

 

It seems very sharp, clear and natural, with relatively "neutral" bokeh (aperture-shaped highlights are evenly illuminated, rather than having "bad" bokeh with bright outer rings and a dark center, or "good" bokeh with dark outer rings and a bright center). The colors are bright and clear, and I haven't yet noticed any flare, even shooting backlit subjects outside on a bright, overcast day. I have been using the supplied hood.

 

Focusing the 75/2.5 can be a little tricky with the R2, but framing is relatively straightforward. With the Bessa T, focusing is much easier because of the highly-magnified separate rangefinder with diopter adjustment. It's a hassle if you have to focus on something like a black Labrador retriever or a field of grass, where getting a clear split image is difficult.

 

Framing with the 75mm VF on the Bessa T takes some practice. You have to remember that the actual field of view extends below the bottom brightline when focusing at around 2 meters and closer. In landscape mode, I mentally move the whole frame down so that its top corresponds with the dotted parallax-correction line in the VF.

 

Inevitably, upward-tilted shots of converging vertical lines in portrait mode will show some rotational geometric error because of parallax, but that's the way it is with a rangefinder camera. Being unable to frame with compulsive precision helps one to be spontaneous and can be quite liberating.

 

This lens is generally quite highly-regarded, and I would recommend it heartily. It's compact, light, and relatively fast, not too difficult to focus on a camera with a relatively short effective rangefinder baselength (such as the CL, CLE, Bessa R and R2), and fills a valuable and otherwise empty niche in the market.

 

I think Kris's "dream girl" shot shows the lovely colors the lens can render. Jorge M. Treviño posted a really nice B&W shot made with the SLR version of the CV 75/2.5 in Nikon mount on this forum a few days ago: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=009LxJ (sorry I didn't make a proper link).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a shade soft wide open and pretty much outstanding stopped down to f/5.6. Other people have demonstrated that it has pretty nice bokeh and so forth, so I'm not going to post more pictures -- you can't see sharpness on a computer screen. If you want a longish lens for street work, it's an excellent choice, being compact and short enough to scale-focus on bright days.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one of the few shots made with this lens that I have online. This one was made at about f/8 and infinity, although there's not much that can be judged from an image this size. Right now I'm traveling but at home I have some very good examples of close focusing wide open (portraits). It has an exquisite smooth OOF signature (bokeh). I'll try to catch up with the thread nex Monday when I'm home.

<br>

<center>

<a href="http://www.photo.net/photo/2435917&size=lg">

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/2435917-lg.jpg">

</a>

<br>

<i><b>Click on image for details</i></b>

</center>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...