james mitchell dc Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 "Back in 1970, Miami was still a pretty segregated place. I knew this chick who worked as an art director, and she introduced me to the first black that had moved into her building. He was here from Chicago to start a black weekly to compete with the Miami Times. He said he was looking for a photographer. I pointed out that I was white. His reply was that his bosses felt that if the government could force white owned companies to hire blacks then he should hire whites before the government stepped in and forced him to do so. Soon I was down at Dade County police headquarters getting a new press card for the Florida Courrier!"<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james mitchell dc Posted August 12, 2004 Author Share Posted August 12, 2004 "The photo of Rev. Ralph Abernathy was shot on the campus of the University of Miami to a mixed race audience. I was shooting Ilford HP4 in a double stroke M3 with a black late model 85mm f/2 Nikkor, a great lens I always regretted selling. A few years ago I found a clean chrome version and just love it. The M3 was in continuous use until a couple of years ago when I sold it because I'd gotten a near mint one out of an estate."<div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james mitchell dc Posted August 12, 2004 Author Share Posted August 12, 2004 <div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james mitchell dc Posted August 12, 2004 Author Share Posted August 12, 2004 "The other two photos have a more interesting story. The assignment was to photograph an organizational meeting of a new radical black group known by the acronym BAMM ~ Black Afro Millitant Movement. They idolized the Cuban revolutionary Che Guavera. They were a rival group to the Black Panthers. I arived at this rundown building in Miami's black neighborhood known as Overtown about 8 P.M., knocked on the door, and was greeted with a "What th' f*** you doin' here, honkey?" They didn't want to let me in. I showed them my press card, explained that if they wanted coverage in the black paper they'd have to tolerate the paper's token whitey. After a bit of conferring amongst themselves they let me in. One of the deciding factors was they thought I must be cool if I'd come into that neighborhood with my cameras after dark, knocked on their door, and not act scared sh*tless. I got a bunch of photos, had some refreshments with them, and got invited back if I wanted to. My one regret is that I didn't write all the names down on the negative sleeves or contact sheets. I'd have liked to be able to do a follow-up now, find out what became of them. They were a bright bunch of folks! These photos were with a 50mm 1.4 Nikkor and a 35mm f/1.8 Canon on a Leica M4 using Ilford HP4" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james mitchell dc Posted August 12, 2004 Author Share Posted August 12, 2004 Sorry for the mistake on the caption to the second BAMM photo. It should read "Canon" instead of "Nikkor." Working too quickly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_burke3 Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Just an aside for Al: at that time, were you aware of the origin of the Che image that's on the banner the girl is holding? Had you heard of/come across Korda/Gutierrez? Just thinking about the resonances there - a Leica being used to take a picture of an image originally itself taken with a Leica... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_kennedy Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 On that note - IIRC the Cuban Revolution really brought the 35mm into prominence as a journalistic tool. These guys were living in the bush and a large camera would NOT do. They made do with 35mm RFs, cheap mimeographs and printing presses, short wave transmitters, etc. to get the message out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_kaplan1 Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Thanks for posting these James! Strange that the scanner seems to pick up these what? reflections? bright spots off the high gloss RC paper. I guess we should stick to the Ilford Muligrade double weight glossy dried matte in the future with that scanner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ronald_spaghetti Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 I think this series is brilliant. It captures an innocence/acceptance that has been lost to the western world. Can you imagine, for example, Grant, or Brad, or Maria, or Ed, or Ray, taking pictures of modern day muslims expressing their beliefs and frustrations. Both the photographers and their subjects would be banged up and shafted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry_rory Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Reminds me of Tom Wolfe and his "Radical chic and mau-mauing the flak catchers" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_kaplan1 Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Nah! I think it's still possible to go about anyplace in this country, and probably most other places, and develop enough rapport with people to photograph them. Sure, the world has changed a lot in 35 years! The number of journalists killed by terrorists seems a fightening figure only because they never publish the figures for the number killed in auto accidents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r_b_p Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Pretty exciting photos Al / James. Keep them coming. I especially liked #2. Don't get me started. POWER TO THE PEOPLE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
takkinda_. Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Che was argentinian not cuban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grant_. Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 THIRLLING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
patrick smith Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 A good corollary to "Radical Chic" is Wolfe's discussion of the Wah Ching and the Red Guard in "Funky Chic." That covers a bit more of the fashion element in revolutionary ideology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominic_. Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Reflections or no reflections, they're still brilliant photos, my fav being the first one. Excellent work!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james mitchell dc Posted August 12, 2004 Author Share Posted August 12, 2004 I can certainly attest to the fact that the prints, even on simple high gloss stock, are superior to what I can scan on a cheap flatbed at work (between vital international affairs) and quickly post here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd_phillips1 Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Great shots, Al! I hope they will be in your book along with the story. BTW, put me down for a signed copy! Best, Todd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_kaplan1 Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Just a reminder that if anybody would like to purchase a signed print of any of my photographs just email me. I've been putting a lot of time and effort into this project and every little bit helps. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samuel_dilworth Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Very interesting, Al. I love the posters on the wall in the second and third pictures. And the poses! Man! Love it. I wonder how Che Guevara was perceived in 1970 in the States. I suppose it actually meant something to idolise him back then, in the middle of the Cold War. He was a man of fierce intellect and much learning, who took an economic gamble, and lost. Could have happened to any great thinker. His life story is an inspiration to anyone, even the most capatilist American Dreamer. He had a fascinating work ethic! I think he's a worthy idol, although what he represents today is far removed from what he actually held dear. Were the "refreshments" smokeable? :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grant_. Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 were you a freelancer or a staffer..? just curious because you seem to own the rights to these negs rather than the publication owning them....good deal you got there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
al_kaplan1 Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 They were actually a pretty staight laced group when it came to alcohol and drug use, like it was part of the white man's plot to keep the black man down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray . Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Al, I'll trade you one of mine for a Dylan print.... only if you're interested, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melisa Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Amazing, I'm so happy that you're sharing these. BTW, you really are the best storyteller! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pensacolaphoto Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Very interesting work. Keep such postings going. This is so much more interesting than postings like "is this the right adapter" or "why is Leica bla bla bla". History is intriguing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now