Jump to content

Please advice:Tri-X 400 pushed at 800 with Rodinal


paolo_folzani

Recommended Posts

Once was enough, Hans.

 

While I agree that Microphen is a superior speed enhancing developer, many photographers for many decades have used Rodinal to good effect to create memorable photos from pushed Tri-X.

 

Paolo, check the Massive Dev Chart at www.digitaltruth.com for suggested starting times for this combination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lex:

 

There are important points that we have not considered, and I fault myself for that.

 

1. Is the user trying to achive a grainy, 'pushed' look merely as an artistic effect?

 

2. Or is he trying to get the maximum speed from the film with normal-looking grain, and choosing Rodinal for the latter need?

 

In the former case, Rodinal may be a good choice, but NOT for its ability to enhance speed (in fact, Rodinal loses a little speed) but for its ability to provide a grainy effect at something approaching normal speeds.

 

In the latter case, other developer choices are much more appropriate, including Microphen or Diafine.

 

This is because Rodinal does not fully exploit the speed of modern high-speed films.

 

I hope this sheds some light on this discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually pushed film with Rodinal, and at 12 1/2 minutes at 1:50 68F I've had no trouble getting EI 400 from Tri-X. Getting 800 is then nothing more than a 20-50% increase in time, which hits around 16-minutes for a good start.

 

I don't disagree that diluting Rodinal does decrease it's speed, but I don't see this really starting to happen until beyond 1:50 in my experience with this developer. I also agree that Rodinal isn't going to yield the fine grain structure of lets say Acufine or Microdol-X when pushing Tri-X. Then again, Rodinal is a categorically good compensating developer, which if you don't mind the grain will yield crisp yet fairly un-blocked film. I can think of a lot worse developer to push Tri-X in; Tmax developer, Ilfosol, etc. I can think of better as well such as Acufine/Diafine and Microdol-X

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hans,

 

The point is... the questioner didn't ask IF he should develop with Rodinal, he said he HAD to develop with Rodinal. A subtle difference in usage here. As such, repeating many times your opinion as to the applicability of using this developer is annoying. Once is OK, but you seem to think people just ignore you so you repeat it. Over and over.

 

30 C sounds a bit high for development temps. You will get away nicely with Rodinal at 1+50 for E.I. 800 Tri-X. It's not optimal, but it is printable. As advised above, look it up in the digitaltruth database for reliable starting times. Look for a strong grain pattern and nice tones esp. around Zone 6.

 

tim in san jose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tim O'Brien hat mir gescrieben:

Hans,

 

"The point is... the questioner didn't ask IF he should develop with Rodinal, he said he HAD to develop with Rodinal. A subtle difference in usage here."

 

Paolo is presumably Italian, and perhaps he means only that he has that developer. I did not take it to me he was not free to use something else. Paolo? Can you clarify for us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Tim O'Brien , dec 12, 2003; 03:07 p.m.

Hans,

 

-snip-

 

>As such, repeating many times your opinion as to the applicability of >using this developer is annoying. Once is OK, but you seem to think >people just ignore you so you repeat it. Over and over.

 

Yeah, this guy is a bit of a troll--I'm trying to ignore him... over and over...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...