eliseo_pascual Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 Hi, I develop my sheet film (8x10) negatives by the tray method. As I guess a number of us, I am disturbed by the slightly darkish borders of the negatives which print like more or less subtle lighter border � and quite noticeable in uniform surfaces, like a cloudless sky. I understand that agitation is very much behind the problem: large enough trays, and subtle movements are needed; also rotating 90º the pile of films to avoid repeatedly touching the same border helps �. But the whitish borders continue to appear. I wander whether it may result from the fact that when the films being developed are immersed in the developer, the pile they form is far from perfect: thus while the center of the film is quite immobile between the two adjacent sheets �avoiding developer agitation there - , the borders outreach the limits of the pile, and developer moves there even with the minimal and inevitable agitation of the developer which results from rotating the sheets. I wander whether anybody has essayed any method to hold the films into the pile without outreaching its limits. Also whether developing a shorter number of films � lets say 3, with a 10 min shift per film � results in less border overdeveloping than developing a higher number � with more frequent shifts and accordingly more developer agitation. And of course I will appreciate any comment on the problem!. Thanks !! Eliseo Pascual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 Do you presoak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimvanson Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 I could be wrong but I fail to see the presoak connection (and Ilford says NO to presoak).<p>I believe two things are possible here;<P>First...I believe you are correct if you're saying that stacking a dozen sheets (or half a dozen) in a small tray is a bad Idea. The exposed edges will get more fresh developer on them..the centers, that are not as exposed (if you will) to fresh developer will come along slower.<p>And two...which is connected to one...again small trays may be the problem. Small trays will produce more laminar flow along the edges then in the center, I found this to <i>really</i> be the case when I bleach back prints (to sepia tone them) in potassium ferricyanide. If you're bleaching a 8x10 print in a 10x12 tray you can see the edges bleaching <b>much</b> faster then the center...hopes this helps...jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christian_olivet Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 Yesterday I was loading some film and turned on the light for a split second when I realized I left the stack of film on the counter. The result was that I exposed the edges of the film, and of course they develop in the tray. Now, I doubt you made that mistake. I believe too many sheets of film is no good. I had severe developing problems doing that. Now I went back to single sheet developing and I am not having any kind of problems like that you mention. Also some developers are more prone to fog than others. I have switched from ABC pyro to Pyrocat HD which reduces fog to a very minimum. Anyway, only you can find out what it is. I would try a single sheet in a tray with fresh developer and see if you get the same results! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william_marderness1 Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 I had this problem when toning an 8x10 print in an 8x10 tray. Try larger trays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhananjay_n Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 You are quite right in your assessment. This happens when you develop lots of sheets at a time in trays. The sheets do not sit in a perfect pile but are bound to move around a little. This means the sheets the bottom will have some edges exposed while the center of the sheet is covered bby sheets on top. If the rest between agitation of each sheet is very long, the developer is bound to get exhausted. But while the middle of the sheet will not get fresh developer till it is cycled from the bottom of the stack to the top, the exposed edges will get fresh developer and continue to develop. Thus, the ot edges. Of course, I'm assuming other problems have been eliminated. That is, you are using the next larger size tray, the problem is not due to bellows flare (when you photograph bright objects e.g., snow, you can get this), you are presoaking or otherwise ensuring even uptake of developer and so on. The solution is to develop a smaller number of sheets. That way, the developer in the emulsion does not exhaust before it is time to cycle sheets. Developing a good agitation-rest ration is a pretty important part of developing in trays. As a starting point, if it is taking longer than 30 seconds or so to move a sheet through one complete cycle, you probably should develop fewer sheets. Another techniques that minimize this problem are to use a large tray and place a pencil or something under the end of the tray so that the tray is tipped forward slightly towards you. This makes the stack slide towards you and makes it easier to sort of herd the stack together. You sshould also try to manage the stack with your free hand so that you prevent sheets at the bottom from sliding around. Hope this helps. Cheers, DJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank_scheitrowsky1 Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 Too many sheets, and trays too small. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_a._smith1 Posted September 7, 2003 Share Posted September 7, 2003 For 8x10s use an 11 x 14 tray--nothing smaller. I have frequently developed a dozen films at a time and have never had this problem. I believe your problem is bellows flare--often unavoidable when bright things are photographed--like skies. Do you always use a lens shade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_p_goerz Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Buy a Jobo and make your life easier, I did! :-) CP Goerz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doremus_scudder1 Posted September 8, 2003 Share Posted September 8, 2003 Eliseo, I solved a similar problem with 4x5 film by increasing the agitation and keeping the film in the stack exactly on top of one another with no edges sticking out. I like to use as little agitation as possible to maximize edge effects, however, I found that my once-through-the-stack every minute agitation was too little and resulted in the problem you describe. I have since increased the agitation rate for the first half of the development time only (this is where most of the mottling and uneven development usually occurs) to once-through-the-stack each 30 seconds. I can develop up to six sheets easily with this scheme. I also make sure that the top sheet is pressed down firmly onto the stack and that the stack is as perfectly aligned as possible. This has solved my problem. I know many recommend 8x10 trays for 4x5, but I develop 4x5 sheets in a slightly oversize and deeper 5x7 tray with 500+ ml of solution only (PMK, Pyrocat or HC110). Film agitation is from the short side, turning the film 180° each time. Using smaller trays helps me keep the stack aligned more easily and seems to have no adverse affect on the evenness of development. For those previously developed films there is always edge burning... Hope this helps, ;^D) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now