<p>The EOS 3 is my favorite. They are not very expensive these days but very nice. </p>
<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/17757279-lg.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="603" /><br> OMD EM1 with 12-40</p>
<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/17747208-lg.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="462" /><br> OMD EM 1 with Contax 60mm Macro</p>
<p>Olympus Em-1 with 12-40</p> <p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/17741626-lg.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="501" /></p>
<p>At this point, with the new micro 4/3, the new Fujis, and the new DSLRs, it is really challenging to complain about image quality. We are now...
<p>I am finding that the micro 4/3 give enough sharpness and depth of field to use the lenses wide open, lowering the average ISO that I use...
<p>The Sigma 50 1.4 looks to be a significant improvement over the "fast fifties." On the micro 4/3 front the Olympus 12-40 2.8 and the 25 1.8...
<p>I have to say that lens designers are really making huge strides these days. Some of the new lenses are significant improvements over those of...
<p>I have to say that the Olympus 12-40, while not a dedicated macro lens, is pretty useful for small things. The close up capabilities really...
<p>The problem with full frame mirrorless is that the lenses aren't much smaller than DSLR lenses. You can put a small micro-4/3 camera with a...
<p><img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/17730320-lg.jpg" alt="" width="616" height="650" /><br> Fun with plasma.</p>
<p>Fancier APS-C and full frame cameras will be larger and heavier, which may be an issue as well. +1 on JDM's suggestion to handle them before...
<p>The 7D was praised for it's low light performance- in 2009. It isn't 2009 anymore. Micro 4/3 cameras have better low light and dynamic range...
Separate names with a comma.
