Jump to content

v_willendorf

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. <p>The decision is in: throw the baby out with the dishwater.<br> The Parish Arts Council discussed the upheaval caused by my illegal Christmas cards and without seeking comments from its members or the advice of a lawyer issued this statement:</p> <p><em>“The Arts Council policy of street and/or </em>photo shop<em> (sic) photography that involves photographs of</em><br> <em>Individuals to be sold for profit by any means.</em><br> <em> </em><br> <em>The Arts Council Board of Directors on June 2, 2016, adopted the policy that the DAC Gallery</em><br> <em>will not accept any art form of photography that is to be sold for profit, that involves photograph(s) of individuals, not accompanied by official binding consent/release form(s), signed by the individuals in</em><br> <em>the photograph(s).”</em></p> <p>Of course, I was wrong in what I did. I goofed. And it’s not because I was unfamiliar with copyrights and model releases. I was around when Martin Bressler (<a href="http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Bressler_7.1.pdf">http://www.cardozoaelj.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Bressler_7.1.pdf</a>) and VAGA were trying to heighten artists’ awareness of copyrighting their own work. (I was even invited to sign the copyright poster and tote bag they had made up for promotion, right along with Robert Rauschenberg and quite a number of other recognizable artists. I declined since I wasn’t in that league of artists, but I was there and they insisted and so I did.)<br> I have been in and about photographers all my life but I’ve only worked as one for or about 4 or 5 years with a wedding photographer. I photographed using a Nikon D2H which was brand new at the time. I have taken university photography courses and have used the home darkrooms of several friends. I have even loaded film into a developing canister under heavy covers in my bed when that proved to be the darkest place I could find.</p> <p>When I first joined Photo.net, I noticed so many people enjoyed Al Kaplan in the Leica forum and time and again cajoled him about writing a book. They printed t-shirts with him and his Leicas. They visited him in North Miami from all over when they happened to be passing through. But nobody did anything to help him with a book. It was obvious he wasn’t and maybe couldn’t attempt something like that alone. One day, I got in touch and told him I would set up a blog for him, but he had to do it exactly as I laid it out. He agreed. I titled the blog, set it up, and wrote the first couple of entries for him in what I felt was his writing style. He printed the photos in his darkroom and mailed them to me. I posted them and his blogging until I taught him how to at least post the blogging. He never figured out how to post the photos. Not that long after, the blog was a Yahoo Pick of the Week. <a href="http://thepriceofsilver.blogspot.com/">http://thepriceofsilver.blogspot.com/</a></p> <p>Photo.net held a Saturday morning contest about that time that I entered. I think it was announced several days ahead, and photographers were supposed to enter photos they had taken that morning or that day. There were three judges who would pick their top 5 photos of the bunch. My photo showed up at one rank or another in all three judges lists.</p> <p>Now, I am saying all this in my defense, and in any way that it might work for a defense for me. I live in a town that is halfway between the movie “Deliverance” and the book, “Lord of the Flies.” A number of years ago the parish arts council asked me to paint the empty store windows of an abandoned downtown. I thought it might be fun to paint a whole art gallery. I began copying one of Picasso’s Harlequin paintings, and then Edward Hopper’s “Nighthawks”. I did not assume authorship of these paintings, and credited each. After that, I decided children might enjoy a colorful and fanciful Chagall painting. One night, after the painting was nearing completion, someone washed off the whole thing from the window.</p> <p>No one seemed concerned. I was the only one that was outraged.</p> <p>And yet, now, I feel I have been virtually tarred and feathered for one misstep that I was not even allowed to correct and put right myself.</p> <p> (By the way, the guy who washed off my painting was sent to Federal Prison years later for money related issues. At least someone reproached him for something.)</p>
  2. <p>I've been looking at so many websites about this. Commercial use means using their image to sell a product. Like motor oil. Not the actual photograph itself.</p>
  3. <p>Yesterday I stopped in at the parish Arts Council Gallery. I am a member of the gallery, but not a very active one. The president of the Arts Council told me that they had had a little incident there last Christmas. A woman had come in and had become very upset when she had noticed her daughter-in-law and her grandson on one of the Christmas cards I had designed and photographed. And with that, the Arts Council president handed me the whole pack of Christmas cards I had taken in. All of them, not just the one with the daughter-in-law and grandson. She had pulled them from display last Christmas. (First of all, let me say I am not a stranger there. The Arts Council President is in constant contact with my mother who does all their posters and bulletins. I live in the same house as my mother. I am not hard to get in touch with.)</p> <p> <img src="https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13266059_10153975604482839_4046159504795033509_n.jpg?oh=d356f37708c8fb100a6647112958d41a&oe=57D5BB54" alt="" width="432" height="648" /><br> (Sorry about the picture quality here...the cards were printed nicely.)</p> <p>At first, I thought, hey, it was a Christmas Parade in a little town. It's street photography. If they don't want to be in photos they shouldn't march in a parade. But then I began to wonder if my altering the photo in the way that I did, also altered the rights of using the photo. I had taken several shots of these people. I took the boy from this shot, the Santa Claus from another shot, and added them to another photo of the same three people. I cut them out and dropped in a background.<br> So what do I actually have here? Street photography or a photograph of people from who I got no permission from. <br> I want to add, that of course if the woman, or the gallery, had approached me with their "crisis", I would have removed the card from the gallery after which I had made clear my rights in the matter. Now, I think I have no idea what my rights were in this instance. I took many parade pictures that day and turned many of them into similar Christmas cards. Everyone else seemed to be delighted by the cards, but of course, delight does make legal rights.</p>
  4. <p>I've heard so much about the upgrade for the iPhone 6 camera and was thinking about getting one mainly for the use of the camera as a point and shoot. But then, I wondered if the Leica C-Lux 3 Digital Camera would be a better choice.<br> How would they compare for a point and shoot. The iPhone 6 has so many camera apps and can become so many different cameras. Is there something to be said which makes a clear choice between the two?</p>
×
×
  • Create New...