Jump to content

Troll

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,352

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Troll last won the day on April 17 2008

Troll had the most liked content!

Reputation

15 Good

14 Followers

See all followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Troll started following golden
  2. Troll started following brian_ellis3
  3. Troll started following aldo_de_filippi1
  4. Troll started following tim_atherton2
  5. Troll started following gerald_widen
  6. john_fleetwood started following Troll
  7. keith_pitman started following Troll
  8. tony_terlecki started following Troll
  9. mike_thompson6 started following Troll
  10. ken_schroeder started following Troll
  11. Troll
    My Summar is optically perfect, and has what may be factory coating. The chrome barrel is unfortunately scraped down to the bare metal from lots of use, and looks terrible. I can't tell any significant difference between its performance and my Collapsible Summicron, either B&W or color. I particularly like to use it because 36mm slip-on filters fit, from my other screw mount lenses.
  12. Troll
    From the position of the focusing stop it is obviously a very early, probably non-coupled, lens. Certainly NOT a bayonet mount. I still wonder if it's a 50mm Hektor, or possibly a non-Leitz lens. The viewfinder mask suggests a 90mm.
  13. Troll
    Kodachrome was ASA=10, Kodachrome II was ASA=25 (in my opinion, the best color film ever made),
  14. Troll
    f:4.0 would have been fine. (LTM would have been mouth-watering!.)
  15. Troll
  16. Troll
    If I could read it, I wouldn't have to ask here. The image was taken from an AHC TV program (TV screen) about Hitler, I can't improve on what is shown. Sorry. (It's bugging the hell out of me!) Thanks.
  17. Troll
    Definitely not an Elmar! Could it be a 50mm Hektor? Why is there a 90 mm mask over the viewfinder?
  18. Troll
  19. Troll
    Is it really 24mm x 36mm, or is it a little less to allow space between the negative images? Thanks.
  20. Troll
    Looks to me like a tiny bit of camera shake.
  21. Troll
    Does anyone else enjoy this wonderful old Leica book from the 1930s? His inspiring text is accompanied by some 200 perfectly exposed, perfectly composed, beautifully printed, boring photographs. Still, I love this historical old book. Wilhelm
  22. Troll
    Best of all: Nikkor 105/2.5 LTM. (The field of view exactly matches the 90mm framelines of my M3.)
  23. Troll
    Wear, tare, and Murphy's Law just to frustrate you.
  24. Troll
    Not every camera is improved by a later version. The later version of the T series, such as the T-900, are smaller but don't have as good stabilization, as well as a shorter tele optics.
  25. Troll
    I dearly love my T100, but when shooting at ISO=800 there is too much "grain" in the faces, (Pizza face). Just a slightly higher resolution would fix it. (I also have a T900, but the stabilization isn't nearly as good as the T100). Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...