Jump to content

ted_campbell1

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. 8063 and 8062 for the Beseler 23c is what I meant. thanks!
  2. <p>I found a used Beseler 863 neg carrier for sheet film. Does any one know if it can be used for roll film like the 862. What are the differences between these two carriers? Thanks in advance!</p>
  3. <p>Way to go at this moment is ILFORD stay away from Ultrafine and Arista unless you want a fool of yourself. Wait for the weather conditions and order from B&H</p>
  4. <p>My apologies to James Damies, no offense intended on my comment. I continue to enjoy and learn from this thread and appreciate and welcome all your comments. THANKS!</p>
  5. <p>Looks that the 24 exposure film remaining inventory is still available same with as Arista's premium 24 exposure rolls, smart asses please be aware instead of giving me a hard time.</p>
  6. <p>At least 30 years ago East German's ORWO was my only B&W film choice, Thank you very much you're no longer available. </p>
  7. <p>Hope that is the case but I doubt it. Bottom line I can't no longer get it. At the present time I'm eye bowling Kodak's 200 ISO consumer's film for as long at it last. In my opinion Black and White films will survive way longer.</p>
  8. <p>Sorry guys I'm not talking about Superia, I'm talking about their consumer's 200 ISO film. IMHO I see the discontinuance of this film as a negative sign in the future trend of color negative film, just thought it was productive to share my opinion with you. Disagree with one who said that B&H has a reputation of reporting false news. Like or not the film is now discontinued.</p>
  9. <p>According to my B&H wish list I'm very sad to learn that Fuji has just discontinued its 200 ISO 35 mm OUTSTANDING color film. This was my go to cheap C-41 film during many many years in the past.<br> Do you feel pessimistic about the future of color negative film?</p>
  10. <p>By the way if you haven't noticed Fuji discontinued all 100' rolls production a few years back, I think Kodak is heading into that direction. Way to go now is Ilford if you want to save money and still make sense out of the practice of bulk loading.</p>
  11. <p>Personally switching to Ilford film for bulk loading, Kodak probably isn't making a profit on 35mm 100' rolls if you look at their current prices: $100 for a roll of Tri-x! What's the point in bulk loading Kodak film? </p>
×
×
  • Create New...