t_tran4

I found it easier to read from books rather than websites (where I can always go back to the chapters related to the specific lighting to use for certain situations). I liked "speedliter's handbook" by Syl Arena. In my opinion, I don't think it's wise to try to shoot indoors or outdoors at a wedding without even a flash. I would think you're going to get unpleasant shadows on your subject's face without any fill lighting. When someone is paying you money to make sure you capture that split second moment, you shouldn't be depending on ambient lighting to make it successful.

Also, know how to adjust your flash manually and quickly... just in case ettl doesn't do it for you.

Due to 7d's cropped sensor, you might want to look at tamron 17- 50. You can probably get it used for $300. Also, rather than renting Canon's 24-70 mkII, you might consider the mkI, Canon ef- s 17-55 IS, or tamron's 24-70 which also has image stabilization.. And cost a lot less to rent. All the mentioned above are F2.8.

Great photos. I agree with the others that the reception shots can improve. Maybe increase the ISO and bounce off the ceiling. Try to balance the lighting of the subjects with the background. The subjects are lit up a tad too much compared to the dark background. I really like the bright soft radiant style of your other shots though. I personal don't think you have a "general over exposure" problem as Bob mentioned. I took a look at his wedding portfolios and in my opinion, his photos can use a bit more exposure. Not to be offending, but that's just my preference.