-
Posts
59 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
78 ExcellentAbout Asad Ali
- Birthday 04/15/1976
Personal Information
- About Me
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Asad Ali changed their profile photo
-
Asad Ali started following wolf_rainer_schmalfuss
-
Alternative photography like gum printing or cyano type etc users use inkjet transparencies to make photosensitive prints. Good transparency is very close to the negatives and bigger size are available. But of course they are black and white or tri-color. However the idea of making photosensitive digital print from projector is intutive and very interesting if it work.
-
What software
Asad Ali replied to richard_bowman's topic in The Digital Darkroom: Process, Technique & Printing
Try the software that came along with the camera probably Nikon's Capture NX-D. -
-
-
-
All current Nikon cameras are good. Please don't minus D750 or D610 from FX choices merely because of one or two aspects only. D750 is probably the most popular among the FX line. My suggestion of D7200 was only of the budget you mentioned and the crop factor of your previous camera. I only mentioned "my experience" of low light between D750 and D7200, but this does not means I depend solely on D7200. One factor only. I had used Medium Format in film for almost ten years, and scanning these negatives are a different kind of output. They are different horses . However for Enlargements while printing sizes larger than 16x20 inches the D810 shows a very clear difference than the others and specially the DX models. Here printing large sizes is again a factor only. There are pluses and minuses depending on the use of the cameras mentioned above.
-
Andrew I was suggesting low light performance on my experience in same lighting condition, I am not comparing the two numerically. But on my visual experience.
-
I would suggest D7200. Its a good camera in the budget you mentioned. I had used it along with D750 as a second camera usually for close ups and when doing post processing personally I found its low light performance better than D750. It also has no optical low pass filter and speed goes up to 1/8000 of second as oppose to the D 610 and D750 (which indeed are full frame) and have 1/4000 sec limit. image quality is quite good, I also have used D7100 and found the image quality of D7200 way better than D7100.
-
-
-
-
I must elobrate the inconsistancies of younguo tranciever for the sake of argument. This is how I use younguo transceiver with my d810. One sb 700 ( on the master mode ) and on the camera with the tranciever. The other or others sb 700 (never in remote mode but simply in on position) on the stand with other tranciever. Both flash guns on ttl. If flash is switched on before the tranciever an error come on LCD of flash but they fire in ttl. If they are switched on after the camera and the tranciever then, they act normal showing normal LCD with Master and slave. Then LCD behaves normal. Sb 5000 don't fire in Master mode on camera but fire on slave and don't in ttl. Sb 5000 on tranciever never showed two flashes of the ttl but sb 700 does. Yes I had heard better consistency about Godox from friends but I doesn't own the system yet so can't comment.
-
Andrew upgrading to d850 along with the wr-r10 and wr-a10 is the only solution to use the radio capability of sb 5000. Optical CLS is a hazard during fast wedding shoots, specially in tight time. Half of one's concentration is lost making sure of the optical sensor on the flash toward the camera. I use yongnuo transceivers but they have consistency issues. At the end the goal is a good work flow so if you upgrade to D850 then take the full advantage of sb 5000.