steven_kornreich

<p>Ulrik,<br> How is corner sharpness on either lenses? Is one better then the other</p>

<p>Shooting mostly at infinity, which of Hasselblad's 50mm lenses would serve me best.<br> I currently have the 50/2.8 FE and yes central sharpness is excellent but corner sharpness not so good.<br> I did some tests at F8 at infinity focus and hyperfocal focus, not much difference.<br> Would the CF, CFE,CFE IF yield any better results?<br> BTW, using Phocus and with the proper lens correction setup for lens type, distance and f stop.</p>

<p>Ed,<br> Thanks for the information. I actually decided to go with the FLM CF-48FT Ball Head without a QR, I can just attach my Hasselblad H QR via 3/8 right to the FLM<br> <br />Steven</p>

<p>I finally got my 203FE back from Hasselblad Service, I had the digital modification done so I can use my CFV39 Back.<br> I have for now attached the Hasselblad Tripod Quick coupling H 3043326 seems to work ok now I am looking, for a ball head to go along with my Girzo 3530LS I am looking at the RRS BH 55 and the Arc Swiss Z1 SP with 3/8 screw.<br> I have also looked at just replacing the baseplate with either the Hasselblad to Arca plate from Clearsight <br> http://clearsightusa.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=52&product_id=69<br> And getting a complete ball head with Arca clamp.<br> Just not sure which direction to go.</p> <p>Steven </p> <p> </p><div></div>

<p>Does Hasselblad use a different WLF for the 203FE as opposed to the 501/503?<br> The reason I ask is I just picked up a used 203FE with a WLF, the WLF fits loose in my 203 and its hard to see the internal LCD.<br> If there is a different WLF for the 203 does anyone know the Hasselblad part #<br> Thanks</p>

<p>Ed,<br> Thanks for the information. If using the 200 series body am I still limited to 1/500 shutter speed using F lenses or can I go faster?<br> Just so I understand, even with MLU on the 200 bodies and use F lens it will still have more vibration issues then the 500 body with CF lenses. <br> I plan to use longer lenses 110 and up and I am worried about vibration</p> <p> </p>

<p>I just purchased a CFV 39 back and having a hard time deciding on what platform to use it on.<br />I primarily shoot outdoors, no studio stuff. I guess my options are a 503CW, 501CM or a 203FE modified digital.<br />I currently have a 50/4 F and 150/4 F lens, so of course I should be looking at a 203FE.<br />Though I am not sure if I should invest in the 200 series at this point. They are quite a bit of more money the s 503/501<br /><br />In terms of usability does the back work better with the 500 series or 200 series? Or is it about the same.<br />I was reading that when using a 500 body, to do longer exposures one needs to use a sync cable not sure if this is also the case with the 203FE.<br />My other concern is vibration. With MLU on both systems, in general which body has more vibration or are they both about the same.<br /><br />Thanks</p>