Jump to content

samuelferguson

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Thank you, I didn't know C-41 films needed different chemistry. I will steer away from developing this for the time being and see if this still results in my next roll.
  2. I used a Canon EOS 500, I mainly used the aperture priority mode. it says the battery isn't low and I can't see any corrosion. ar all the frames signs of underexposed frames or any light leaks?
  3. I shot a roll of Ilford Black and white film with a camera I have never had issues with before. I develop and scan my negatives myself however I am new to it! I developed my negative which started with loading it in the changing bag, rinsing the film in the tank, developing it with the CineStill DF96 Developer + Fix Monobath at the right time and temperature. I gave the film a final rinse with water but I was concerned that the water was maybe too hot but didn't think this would affect the negatives and maybe it doesn't. When I looked at the negative some looked barely exposed and just didn't look right (as attached in the photos), some were better than others on the roll but they gave me all different terrible results. I was wondering if anyone knows what the cause of this was? Camera light meter broke, underexposing them all? A light leak in the changing bag or camera? wrong temperature for the rinse? Thank you look forward to the responses! Drive Photo link: Meet Google Drive – One place for all your files
×
×
  • Create New...