sam_reeves1

OP I just went through the scenario on indoor hockey so the 70-200 f2.8 was a must. Sign up at KEH Camera. They have sales and I was able to save 15% last week on a Nikon 70-200 f2.8 in like new - condition. KEH's grading scale is very conservative, and the example I received was basically brand new without a box or paperwork from Nikon. It di not have any marks on it at all and I could not tell that it had been used. Seems to work great and KEH gives you a 6 month warranty, which is better than Nikon Refurbished. Good Luck!

Thanks to all for your help with this endeavor. With the help of Elliott and KEH I was able to get the Nikon Lens for less than the refurb. :))

Ok, so now I am convinced that the Nikon 70-200 VR II is going to be the best option. My choices are (after I find more money) is Used from KEH, Used from Adorama or a refurbished lens. Give the used KEH warranty is 6 months Adorama 3 and refurbished is 3. Costs are anywhere from $1,799 to $2,099 used and 1,900 to 2,000 for refurb. What's the best value?

Ok, I know this has been discussed a lot, but I am still confused. Facts to consider: I am an amateur Camera is a Nikon D800 It will be a dual use lens. My main reason for asking the question is the 70-200 f4would be adequate for most uses, however my son plays ice hockey and I want to capture the best shots I can while he plays. I can't afford the f2.8 at the moment, even the refurb would be hard to swing. Sigma and the Tamron are options, but I my preference would be to have the quality and reliability of Nikon. Other options would be the 70-200 f2.8 VR1 or the 80-200 f2.8 I plan to use the lens for other outdoor photography as well. Opinions will be appreciated! Thanks in advance Sam