Kinda of just want to answer these for myself right now, and maybe that will give you a better idea of where my head is at, or reveal places I need to be thinking differently in!
1. The mountains were the main subject of most all the photos.
2. I kind of didn't want to "fill the frame" with the mountains, and have them be more distant, to represent what they looked like if you were standing in the same spot I was.
3. So this is where I'd say that I kind of wish the grasses were just empty in some of the shots, but with the shots still framed the same way they are. I don't mind that the mountains would be small with a empty field in front. Maybe it's wrong of me, but I kind of want to rebel against the advice that there needs to be something interesting in the foreground. I think that takes away from the mountains in the background.
4. Probably could have spent more time on angle and focal length.
5. With landscapes, I tend to want everything in focus, and that's why I stuck with the kit 18-55mm lens.
6. So I tried to do that in some of the photos, but probably not as effectively as I could have!
7. Perhaps, I might have gone too center-happy with some of the photos.
8. Not really, I tend to hate most HDR photography I see.
I definitely could probably have spent more time editing the photos in Photoshop, I tend to maybe be too conservative in saturating photos, cause I don't want it to start looking to unrealistic, or different than what it looked like in real life. And yes I definitely agree on taking lots of shots, I have two 256GB cards that I bought back when they cost $300 each!