robert_wong

<p>HaHa!</p>

<p>I don't think he was arguing, only providing relevant information.<br> If you think the D800 is up to the job, then go for it.<br> If your sensor burns up, then you were warned.</p>

<p>You might want to check out Michael Erlewine's videos and blogs.<br> Here is a link to a youtube video:<br> He seems to have quite a bit of knowledge on this subject.<br> HTH</p>

<p>Thank You, All. I never thought this would be a 'Most Active Thread', but I have enjoyed all the replies and have learned quite a bit.<br> Yes, Mr. Laur, I think anyone who did that work would have a heart attack if they could see how easily we can manipulate a photo nowadays. Though I am old enough to be pre- autofocus, this question has bugged me for the longest time.</p>

<p>I hope this is the right category, and not too obvious...<br> For the longest time I have been intrigued by the headshots of major film stars from the 30's and 40's regarding how they were manipulated. Though I have shot film, I never did any manipulations of the negative. Also, a recent Google, didn't give me any info either. Now that digital makes it so easy, the question haunts me.</p> <p>So, what did they do back then to correct skin defects?</p>