robert_haller

<p>... wonderfull shots - and M4 does the Job perfect ...<br> recently wass given an M3 and never thought this machine would be soooo good - you don´t Need more really ...<br> Keep showing your immages</p> <p>Cordially from Munich<br> Robert</p>

<p>... I quite like those philosopical thinking about the lens-consortium you have (mostly ) at home in the cabinet.<br> Simple and straight:<br> 50 - must have - as Standard right in the middle<br> 35 - should have - to provide "real" view<br> All other lenes are "effect lenses", where you either have<br> a short tele or a wide effect.</p> <p>Most of us sometimes love to add some effect but mostly,<br> the 50´s, especially the Elmar 2.8 and his companions<br> are in the middle to the day.</p> <p>Side thought - the 24 lenght gives a good kick of wide and<br> also produces a clean Picture without stretching things in<br> the corners - I love the 24 2.8 ASPH for that reason.</p> <p>Good Shooting year 2015 to all !!</p> <p>Cordially from Munich</p>

<p>24mm - as simply the widest with no bending lines in the corners<br> you have the WW effect but not the WW standard problems, especially<br> when you shoot architecture.</p> <p>28 is to close to 35 anyway</p>

<p>Hello Paul - Great idea - the less equippment you have the less you fiddle around with it.<br> You should have even more time to capture moments both with your eyes and on film.</p> <p>The best is to concentrate and use the same equippment often - very often - but you know this anyway.</p> <p>Good nite for today from Munich<br> Rob</p>

<p>Paul - keep the M please - we got years ahead together here ...</p> <p>Stay strong !</p> <p>Cordially from Munich<br> Rob</p>

<p>24, 2.8 ASPH for me and the results make me unbeatable happy ... - best of all lenses if you ask me.<br> Have a great eve<br> Rob</p>