Jump to content

r._bond

Members
  • Posts

    155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. <p>I keep reading that I need to downsample my images taken with my new D810 to help reduce the visibility of noise in my images. I recently shot a session and had to use a highish ISO, so my images are quite noisy. I'm going to give my client the images for both web and print. What is the best way to go about resizing/downsampling my images to look best? Thanks in advance.</p>
  2. Yes actually being born. During labor, birth, and after.
  3. I have decided to rent the 750 this weekend to help make my decision
  4. i use my cameras for just taking pictures not video, do video specs won't help me make a decision. I guess I need to find someone who has used both and can compare how the 2 cameras handle noise at ISO 1600-4000 or so, if the 750 layout is bothersome, how loud the 750 shutter is, and if the 750 is really faster for xhildren photography in practice. I've been reading how the 750 has a smaller buffer and even though it has more fps, the buffer fills up faster and can lag. Honestly, I think my best bet is to rent the 750 and just hold it in my hands and compare them. No local shops carry the 750 unfortunately so I'm not sure spending $200 just to rent for a few days is a smart decision or not.
  5. You would be surprised at how dark it can be in the delivery room. Some moms want it pretty dim at times. I'm not just shooting the actual birth but the moments leading it to it at times. I've got to tell the story of the labor. In sure both cameras are perfectly capable for this style of photography. I also shoot families and children, both indoor lifestyle shoots and outside with lots of light. Again, both cameras would do a perfect job. However, im just trying to find out if there is any advantage of having the d810 over the 750? each canera is capable of big prints and shooting in low light.
  6. I have the sigma 35 1.4, the nikon 50 1.4g and 85 1.8g as well.
  7. <p>So, you are thinking the Sigma and Tamron lenses might be the issue? I've heard nothing but good things about these 2 lenses, but maybe that could be the case here.</p>
  8. <p>I think birth photography might be a relatively new thing :)<br> I started with the Sigma 35 1.4 but switched to my Tamron 24-70 when I noticed the 35 was front focusing (had to fine tune later). I have the 50 1.4 and 85 1.8, but I needed wider than those.</p>
  9. Thanks Shun. I've only had the 810 for about a week and shot one birth with it. Ive contacted the store I purchased it from and they have no problem exchanging it for a 750. I appreciate everyone's inpitvand suggestions.
  10. So, besides the 36 mp, what would the advantages be of having the d810 over the 750 for birth and children photography? I'm still on the return window for the 810.
  11. <p>Oh, and I didn't buy the 810 necessarily for the 36 mp. At the time I purchased it, the 750 wasn't out yet and I do not like the clustered focus points of the 610. The D4s is way out of my budget, so that isn't an option. <br> Besides birth photography, I mainly shoot children, so a fast AF system is needed.</p>
  12. <p>Shun, so the AF system on the 750 is just a touch better than the 810? What about noise capabilities? Would the 750 be much better at handling high noise than the 810? Grain is a part of birth photography as many births happen in dark rooms, but I would want the least grain possible. I'm not a fan of noise. <br> Yes, Chip. This is very real. Look up birth photography. You will see some amazing photographs. and Moms love them.</p>
  13. <p>I have just started building my portfolio to get into birth photography, where obviously, there can be little to no light at times. I purchased the D810 before the announcement of the 750 was made. I really love the 810, but I'm wondering if the 750 would best fit my needs due to its high ISO capabilities and being able to focus at -3ev. I keep reading how it can practically focus in the dark and it handles high ISO beautifully. There were times at my last birth, where my D810 could not focus due to the low light and I am awful at manual focusing.<br> Also, due to the high MP on the 810, I'm thinking the photos taken at high ISOs would be more noisy than if taken with the D750. Is that the case?<br> I would love to hear your thoughts on the 2 cameras based on my needs. I have a short window now where I can exchange out the 810 for the 750, if I should so choose.</p> <p>Thank you so much in advance. </p> <p> </p>
×
×
  • Create New...