peter_michelena3

Also, I want to emphasize that I was not paid and the dog owners did receive valuable compensation in form of edited images. There was a verbal agreement that I would be using the pictures in a book. Does that matter or do I still need a property release from the owner of the dog?

Thanks, William. I’m in Los Angeles, CA. By commercial use, I mean if Iwanted to license the images for use on other things like apparel, or a calendar, etc. Also, I tried to change the title of the posting, realizing it was inaccurate, but was unable to. I appreciate your doing that for me

I’m a professional photographer and Pit-Bull rescue advocate. I invited rescued Pit-Bull owners to bring their dogs to my studio for a free photo-shoot for book of Pit-Bull headshots. They were all told that’s what it was for and they all received a substantial set (12-24) of edited images in digital form, in exchange for their participation. I didn’t think I should require model releases, because the subjects are not people. Plus I didn’t charge the owners, who did receive valuable consideration. Am I wrong? Do I need a release to use the images for a commercial purpose like a book or merchandising? Thanks

I photographed a luxury home in Los Angeles as a favor for a close friend who wanted pictures of the home to remember it by, since they were selling it and it was the home they had grown up in. As a professional photographer, I shot and edited the images beautifully and although I am not a real estate photographer per se, the pictures are comparable to any a skilled real estate photographer might produce. The realtor is now interested in the pictures, since they show the house as a fully furnished home, not as it is presently- empty and cold. I would love to hear some thoughts as to how to price the pictures for the realtor. There are both complete multi angle interior and exterior shots in the portfolio, approximately 30 images in total. Thanks!