patrick l.

I really appreciate all the responses. Thanks folks!

My cheater reading glasses are +1.75, hence, from this chart I am probably looking for a diopter +1.0 Thanks again.

Thanks, I will find something at some point.

No worries, I appreciate the effort. This is something that I toy with as much as anything. Digital is where I make my money, the older gear is just a comfort thing for me.

Thank you, PT. I actually have prescription glasses and "cheaters" about +1.75 I believe. Do you know of a source for the screw in diopters that are attached at the viewfinder? I really don't want to go the Ebay for such a thing. Maybe B&H carries them.

I have a Nikon F that has no diopter. Did not need one when I bought it 30 years ago. I can set the correction needed with my Nikon D500, however, I have no clue how much or little it is correcting my vision. Is there a way to extract that information so I can find/buy the correct diopter needed for my Nikon F eyepiece? Thanks in advance for any and all advice.

<p>I suppose I am funny. I work as a photographer, own some Leica gear, but make my living shooting digital. If I were Ralph Nelson, I would keep the gear and just buy new stuff. Perhaps it means little to him, but, I have always had sellers remorse when I have "sold my children" in the past. He has had an incredible career and this gear is part of his history. Just my take on it.</p>

<p>Greetings all,<br> I hope that this may be the correct place for this question.<br> I am planning on doing some alternative process printing in the near future.<br> I have not done any printing of my own work for ages. In fact, I have not had a printer attached to my Mac<br> in several years. <br> I am considering purchasing the Canon Pixma Pro 100 Printer to use in creating the necessary negative <br> for salt and other types of prints. <br> Has anyone used this printer to make the translucent negative necessary for contact printing?<br> Any advice or experiences are appreciated.<br> Patrick</p>