mike_brown16

<p>Pelican cases are the best for gear that you don't want to get wet and might get banged around. I use them on rafting trips on the Grand Canyon and other rivers regularly. I've never had an issue with either wet, or damaged gear, even in a flip in a major rapid. Less damage proof, but also very waterproof are dry bags. My most recent favorites are the zippered bags by Ortlieb, because they offer the easiest access, far easier than a roll down type dry bag. Just make sure you pull the zipper all the way to the stops. You may want to use a few clothes to pad your gear inside the bag. You can find a great selection of them through either Cascade Outfitters http://cascaderivergear.com, or NRS River Supply http://www.nrs.com, or any of a number of whitewater outfitters. They even make some that convert into backpacks, sort of. If you have the time, it takes about 6 weeks for some of their products, this company in Alaska http://www.sagebrushdrygoods.com/multi-use-bags-and-packs.html makes great waterproof backpacks and other waterproof products. Good luck with your trip.</p>

<div></div>

<p>John,<br> I did a hike with both my 24-70 and 70-200 f2.8. 4 day trip, 6-7 a day with pretty good elevation changes. Nice to have when we stopped to overnight, but more than I would take now.</p>

<p>E.J. On the bright side, it usually makes for some dramatic sunsets. And, if really bad, at least I won't be able to see the length of the climbs I will have to make carrying the 24-70. :-)</p>

<p>Georges.<br> That is exactly what I am talking about. Most of the time during the hike I expect to use the 24-70, but there are times like the one you shot here, that you need the wider vision to really capture the scene.. I did that hike a number of years ago, and the views are phenomenal. Thanks.m</p>

<p>Thanks everyone for your suggestions.<br> Steve,<br> I'm a glutton for punishment... While I know the 24-70 will provide most of what I shoot on the trip, I do want to carry something wider to capture the wide vistas the Sierras have to offer. Crossing the higher passes I might regret it, but, like I said, I'm a glutton for punishment.<br> Georges,<br> Thanks for your suggestions. I look into the three primes you suggested and see what's available. Or maybe even the 18-35, as the weight is essentially the same as the 18 prime and gives me a bit more flexibility.<br> Leszek. Yeah, I saw that. We don't leave for another 3 weeks, so hopefully the fires have stopped and the air has cleared.<br> Jose, I've toted the 24-70 over a number of passes before, and while it is heavy, I want the image quality. I'll curse my choice going over Donahue pass though I'm sure.<br> Kyle, yes, not doubt. Maybe in the future I'll find the money for a whole other set of light weight options, but for now...<br> Kent. I've considered PCE lenses, but I don't have any experience with them yet. I am considering renting one for a Grand Canyon rafting trip I have coming up in May. I was going to post something later for ideas on that. I'm in the process of trying to educate myself on using PCE lenses. Any thoughts on websites or things to read?</p>

<p>I'm getting ready to head out on a week long hike through the Sierras, Mammoth to Yosemite. I'll be lugging my D800E along with my 24-70 2.8. I'm thinking about renting something a bit wider to go along with it and was looking for some suggestions. Since the D800 and 24-70 already add a significant weight issue, I was considering a prime to keep the weight and space additions to a minimum. I'd appreciate any thoughts you all might have on the topic. </p>