Jump to content

KRB

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

27 Excellent
  1. KRB

    Gull

    0002_feeding_birds
  2. KRB

  3. KRB

  4. KRB

  5. I was out of chemicals for color, so I took it to my local (very good) lab. The owner advised to push the film so I took his advise. The results are pretty good. Chiefs Rally - Kelly Burkhart Chiefs Rally - Kelly Burkhart Chiefs Rally - Kelly Burkhart Edit: am I not allowed to link to smug mug? You should be able to right click and see the images... How can I make them show up inline?
  6. Thank you all for this information. I'll let you know how it goes.
  7. I realized this evening that I loaded portra 160 35mm film thinking I loaded portra 400. So I consequently under exposed the whole roll. Should it be developed differently? Or should I just send it in and hope for the best? All shots were outside during an overcast day.
  8. I've only done long exposures on digital. I cranked up the ISO very high set a wide aperture and shot test shots with relatively short shutter speeds to discover an EV. From there I calculated the exposure time based on the difference with the aperture and ISO I wanted to use for the real shot. -K
  9. Interesting thread... I don't have much to offer practically as I'm *very* new to film and don't do any printing. But I'm within 5 years of your age so from that perspective my advice is do what makes you happy. If this is a hobby for you and you have the means and the time and wet printing really jazzes you and the space enables you, then do go big! Have fun.
  10. I just started a similar odyssey and purchased a GL690 (after purchasing a very old Rolleiflex). I'm a 35mm rangefinder shooter, so the Fuji feels more natural to me than the TLR. I've gotten nice results handholding as well as on a tripod. Attached is handheld at (I think), f4, 1/125. -K
  11. While walking around the West Bottoms area of KC this guy noticed my (huge) Fujica GL690. We talked cameras a bit; years ago he had a Rolleiflex. Delta 100, DD-X 1:4.
  12. Not a great image... but here it is. Focus is off somewhat. Later in the roll I have several rangefinder test shots from a tripod showing clearly that the focusing error is mine, not the cameras. BTW, This is from a Fujica GL690. I was not too careful re the focusing, thinking that f5.6 would be pretty generous. It's still pretty thin at this distance!
×
×
  • Create New...