kim_johnson1

Back up your whole computer with Google's Backup and Sync app

I don't use Google to back up my "real" photos. I prefer external drives rather than online storage. But, I do use Google for my phone and some documents on my PC. Google Backup and Sync has seeming always been there and backup up any images on my phone. I imagine what you're paying for is the additional storage space, because the feature has always been free. On the desktop version, you can go into the setting and designate or even create folders that you want to be. (The CHOOSE FOLDER OPTION BELOW opens a window to add another folder to be syncd.) Or you can just create the folders on your MAC and in the Preferences in Google choose the additional folders you wish to be backedup. Thats how I do it.

The OP asked about "STORAGE" so I don't think they are concerned about a buffer. More likely they want to avoid having to purchase a card.

Owning the thing itself doesn’t mean we own the copyright to the thing. Owning specific physical items — these negatives in this case — is entirely separate and apart from owning any copyright there may be in the items. The U.S. Copyright Office explains that: Mere ownership of a book, manuscript, painting, or any other copy or phonorecord does not give the possessor the copyright. The law provides that transfer of ownership of any material object that embodies a protected work does not of itself convey any rights in the copyright.8 I can buy a copy of a book — and then give my copy away, donate it to a library, loan it to a friend. But owning my copy of the book doesn’t give me the right to make more copies and sell them to others. Just because these are photographic images doesn’t change the analysis. The Copyright Office specifically notes on its website that: In the case of photographs, it is sometimes difficult to determine who owns the copyright and there may be little or no information about the owner on individual copies. Ownership of a “copy” of a photograph – the tangible embodiment of the “work” – is distinct from the “work” itself – the intangible intellectual property. The owner of the “work” is generally the photographer or, in certain situations, the employer of the photographer. Even if a person hires a photographer to take pictures of a wedding, for example, the photographer will own the copyright in the photographs unless the copyright in the photographs is transferred, in writing and signed by the copyright owner, to another person. The subject of the photograph generally has nothing to do with the ownership of the copyright in the photograph. If the photographer is no longer living, the rights in the photograph are determined by the photographer’s will or passed as personal property by the applicable laws of intestate succession.9 http://www.legalgenealogist.com/2015/03/04/copyright-and-the-photo-negatives/

Is there some reason why you're optimizing images for a specific device when there are a myriad of sizes and dimensions, all of which are fluid?

Quickbooks is simple and easy. AND there are TONS of free material to help you use it, not mention their forum. You can start with the basic version and it will grow with you as your business does.

Any answer for this question is totally subjective and up to personal taste. While a very long lens may be used when you're at a distance and that is the only use you find it good for, others may like the shallow depth of field it provides in a myriad of situations, or the perceive compression of space, or just the general look using it for portraits, or the Brenizer Method. I've seen some really stunning portraits done with a 300mm lens ... Its totally up to what the photographer creatively wants.

[/img] http://i1053.photobucket.com/albums/s464/kjonbz/ceme_zpshxs5fk9i.jpg 1. 2.39:1 Cinematic Crop 2. Desaturated with Adjustment Layer 3. Applied Black/Teal/Orange Gradient Map - Soft Light Blend 4. Curves to gray out blacks 5. ColorLookup Adjustment Layer to set FoggyNight at 40% 6. Layer Stamp to Combine 7. Created long lens blur with two layers, one sharpened, one with tilt shift blur, with coffins masked out to be sharp. 8. Added Ghostly Woman slightly blurred with Color Dodge Blend at 50% 9. Added black to transparent Gradient to darken left side 10. Used Curves, and Apply image to make mask to dodge light parts of coffins

I'm kinda of confused by the OP. ________________________ Hi all, I have 6 days worth of RAW files to transfer from one hard drive to another. In the past I have been told the only safe way to transfer RAW files is by downloading the photos direct via the camera's transfer cable. I would prefer to copy and paste them from one hard drive to another. Is that safe? Hard drive I am transferring from is a Samsung 2TB USB powered hard drive Its potential destination drive is a Lacie 4TB AC powered hard drive. PS: I do have card readers though I have been told this is not safe to download photos From the OP, its appears the OP has two external hard drives connected to their computer. From the first sentence, it appears the OP has 6 days of raw files to transfer from one drive to another drive. - How does a card reader or dongle even come into play? - If the files are already on the hard drive, that means they have been transferred from the camera (where I would understant carders and dongles would into the conversation). - If the files are already on one hard drive, the OP should be able to just drag the files from one drive to another, using which every file explorer they choose (Windows Explorer, Bridge, or whatever way LR uses) I'm basically confused about talk of card readers with the files are already on the hard drive.

<p><img src="http://i1053.photobucket.com/albums/s464/kjonbz/After_zps654xikve.jpg" alt="" /></p> <p>Considering your conditions. Noiseware does a pretty decent job.</p> <p> </p>

Don't confuse lens sharpness with a wide depth of field. The general thesis has been that a lens is sharpest 2-3 stops above its widest aperture. Thats up to debate im sure, but generally speaking that is what has always been said.

There are probably a hundred ways. But, start with .... duplicate the layer, and fiddle with the blends and adjusting opacity. Start with lighten and screen

Whats the issue? What youve stated is too ambiguous to be helpful. Legally, you cant verbally modify a written contract, but some how you and the bride have made changes, agreed to them and completed the responsibilities of the contract. Depending on how significant the date was, one could argue that the written contract was voided, and you and the bride made a new verbal agreement.

For future reference. They are already in breach of your agreement by not providing the balance the day of the wedding. How you handle that in the future is another issue you should think through. After his sob story about the kids and being broke, I would have responded, I'm sorry to hear that. When you are able to gather the balance, the photos will be here waiting for your approval." Simple. Like or not like, he has the photos and is gambling you won't go through the trouble to get the balance. He wins.

I think in the end, brides will be doing the selecting and the template should appeal to them. I think a bride would like something a little "softer." Youre thinking like a man my friend. lol. Do you have any women friends to ask about the "feel" of it?