ken_tuvman

<p>For future reference > will not let Walgreens process my film again - first roll shot with the Leica IIIF RD was processed by Northcoast Photographic - pictures were much more vibrant.<br> 1st roll was Kodak 400 speed color film - Walgreens got Ecktar 100 - pictures are good but colors look washed out.</p>

<p>Thanks so much - reminds me of a question posed on a motorcycle forum about which oil is best - all great suggestions.<br> If the iPhone app worked, I'd like that cuz I usually carry my phone with me - holding out for the next generation phone so wouldn't have to upgrade the app for awhile - I've seen an attachment that fits on iPhone that looked pretty neat.</p> <p>Will check out options still on the smaller light meters - thank you!</p>

<p>The Leica IIIf RD takes amazing pictures - glad I bought it and thanks for your suggestions.<br> I've got a Sekonic L-558R light meter, about the same size as the camera - interested in a suggestion for a compact and inexpensive, yet accurate light meter. <br> When using my Hasselblad, I always use the Sekonic.<br> During my first roll with the Leica, I mostly followed the Sunny 16 rule and had pretty good results. Back in the 70's with my first rangefinder, I believe the only thing I ever carried around was the exposure guide found in a roll of film - still, with the higher cost of film & processing, I'd like to carry a compact light meter as a backup to my judgement.</p>

<p>I asked the tech at Walgreens if they use different developing processes for different types of film and he said "no." Does that sound right? <br> If a lab like North Coast Photo gets a roll of 400, 100 and 60 wouldn't the developing process be different?</p>

<p>It used to be a no brainer to have film processed at a Target or CVS -wondering how "fresh" film chemicals are at these places given 99.9% of the work they get in is digital.<br> Had my first roll of 35mm (Kodak 400 purchased at CVS) shot with the Leica IIIf RD processed at North Coast Photo - <br> The next roll I'll want to get developed is Kodak Ektar 100 - there's a Walgreens nearby . . .</p> <p> </p><div></div>

<p>This pic shot from first roll of Kodak 400 speed film with my 1952 Leica IIIF Summitar, taken while walking in West Los Angeles April 2014.</p><div></div>

<p>Leica IIIF Summitar - "Jake"</p><div></div>

<p>Hi Everyone,<br> Interested in acquiring a quality rangefinder 35mm camera. I currently own a Nikon DSLR and Hasselblad 501c with several lenses.<br> Leicas are nice but for entry point, not looking to spend prices they're fetching. <br> Have looked at the Canon IIIa and Nikon S3 - I'm sure both are great choices. The Canon's I've seen have the Serener 1.8 lens @ 50mm<br> Interested in a camera body with lens, not buying a body and then looking for a lens. I've also looked at KEH, which I've had good a + experience with but they're selling the parts al-a-carte. <br> Also figure, if I get a kit at the right price, more than likely, will need to send it for CLA.<br> Interested in your perspectives:</p> <ul> <li>I've noticed the Canon III's have the bottom loader - I'm sure loading film this way is an acquired learning curve but wondering if I'm better off finding another model with a hinged loading door on back? But I really like the looks of the bodies on these classic cameras.</li> <li>Any insight on sharpness of pictures with the Serener lens?</li> <li>Who would you send camera to for CLA?</li> </ul> <p>Just an enthusiast, not a professional - looking for something lighter and more compact for taking on motorcycle or to travel destinations far from home that isn't heavy like the Hasselblad. Also, I'm aware of the other brands out there but prefer a Canon, Nikon or Leica if I find one at the right entry point price (under $400).<br> Thank You!</p> <p>Ken</p>