julie_anne

<p>awesome thank you jeff!</p>

<p>I was wondering if anyone knew if there was a way when in photoshop and "saving for web" if there it is possible to have the settings automatically save the photos at a certain MB? The photos need to be under 5MB so for each photo, I save to web, and then have to change the quality bar for each photo to get it at the certain MB I need. I didn't know if there was a way to automatically set that so I didn't have to manually do this for each image, since this becomes very time consuming. Also if there is an easier way to do this within lightroom that also would be incredible. Any insight helps, thanks!</p>

<p>Looking for a great tripod that is also compact and easy to travel with. Don't want it to be plastic, looking for the tripod to last awhile. Preferably one that can fit in a 21" carry on suitcase. Looking to stay under $200? Thanks in advance </p>

<p>Wasn't sure where to post this question so I figured it was a beginners questions. I need to add a logo to a photo i took. The logo is a rectangle with a dark blue background with white writing. I need to place this logo in the middle of the photo, but I need the logo very faded. Almost as if the logo isn't even there. I have done countless google searches and youtube and I cannot figure out how to make the logo faded. If anyone can be of assistance to this I would be so grateful! Links to any websites or youtube videos that you find helpful to help me resolve this. I am using Photoshop 2015 CC and I have lightroom. Please help!!</p>

<p>@JDM i can't get the canon software to even work on my computer that's why I was asking if it was necessary to use. When I put the photos I took onto lightroom they just don't seem great quality when they should be</p>

<p>Just curious, do people upload their photos to the canon software and then upload it into lightroom/photoshop or do people use the canon software at all? I feel like I'm losing quality in my photos and I'm wondering if I'm just skipping a step that I have never done before. Right now I'm just plugging in my SD card into my computer and then importing directly into lightroom. The SD card has been formatted for the camera. </p>

I'm looking to buy a full frame DSLR. The initial decision was between the mark iv or the mark iii but after doing research I realized the mark iii would suffice. But then I thought about the 6d, and realized the specs aren't loads different and the price difference is almost pretty significant. My biggest concern is the AF points, but I'm not sure if this will actually be an issue. The GPS/Wifi don't matter to me. I'm really concerned with the quality of photo and video I will get from the camera set up. The main purpose of this camera is for real estate photography and then some personal use (I.e landscape photos and use at family events). I will also be hoping to use the camera for video tours of the homes. Was just hoping I could gain some insight from people who use/have used either camera or both. I will be using the canon 16-35 f/4L lens on the mark iii. If I end up purchasing the 6d I may do the 16-35 f/2.8 (unless again there are better lens recommendations). Thanks in advance and I appreciate the feedback!

<p>i should have been a little more clear in my post. At my previous job I worked with a 60d it was not my own camera. I am now in the process of buying a new camera and was looking for insight as to whether the 60d should be good enough for what i need to do just with a better lens or if I should be upgrading to a better system </p>

<p>@Andrew --> I'm trying to stick to the DSLR so I can pretty much go to a property and use one camera for everything I need to get (i.e photos and video). My problem with a lens starting at 18 or 17, with the 60d I'm dealing with a crop sensor. So I'm losing some serious area in rooms inside the home. with either of those lenses that means I'm starting at basically 27mm which is not a large area photo in the slightest</p>

The decision between full frame versus crop sensor still is eating away at me. I will be doing high end real estate photography and video. Please give me loads of insight on whether a full frame or a crop sensor makes more sense. Don't have unlimited budget but I would love as much insight on this topic as possible. I have read so much on this and can't come to a decision.

Looking for a Canon to buy for real estate photography. I need a camera that is going to give me a "high end look" and professional looking video. Not looking to go over $1000, have been shooting with the 60d with the 18- 135mm lens. Pictures I didn't think came out the way they should. Shot great for macro, but for landscapes and street photography I just wasn't impressed for the type of camera it is. With the 70 and 80d out I didn't know if anyone would recommend one of those instead. Also would be very open to input on whether the quality of photos has more to attribute to the lens I was using rather than the body. Lens I'm planning on getting is the Canon 10-22mm. Again this camera needs to produce great high end photos and video. Editing programs I am using are Lightroom and photoshop when need be for the photos. Am going to be using Final Cut Pro for the video. Any input and/or experience with doing real estate photography also would be greatly appreciated! Look forward to hearing from people.

<p>@David - It's funny you sent that, that was one of the backpacks i was leaning towards but i don't think it'll fit my laptop, just the iPad</p>

<p>Looking for a camera backpack that can hold my DSLR, macbook pro and ideally my iPad, that isn't an enormous bag. I have found a fair amount of bags I like that can fit my iPad and camera, but for travel on the airplane I want my laptop to do editing, and not only that my laptop comes with me wherever I go essentially. Would like to stay under $100 for a backpack, but I have a feeling I am going to need to go higher. Any and all input would be awesome! </p>

<p>I do real estate and need a wide angled lens to take photos of rooms. I currently have an 18mm-200mm and it just isn't doing the job for what I'm looking for. I also enjoy taking landscape pictures, so I was wondering what people recommended for a wide angled lens to purchase. I was thinking about the 10-18mm, so if anyone has an input or has a better recommendation I would appreciate it! </p>

<p>Unfortunately the purple gets even worse when editing it, but I'm going to do some searches on how to get rid of the purple and then go from there. I'm still tackling the issue on why the pictures look so much better on the camera screen the on my computer but the more I do other research it seems its just because the computer screen is nicer and better then my own computer screen. Would there be an all around lens you would recommend investing in? I'm not a huge fan of the 18-200 it's huge and wicked heavy, nor do i find myself ever zooming in to that extent.</p>