john_kwok

<p>I think Leica's prices are vastly overpriced now, taking for example, their new updated version of the M2 or M4, which equals the price of two, perhaps, three, used M6s in pristine condition. In stark contrast, the Zeiss ZM lenses are far more reasonably priced and are capable of producing results as good as - and in many instances, better - than their Leica equivalents.</p>

<p>I've handled the M-A twice; the first time at last year's Photo Plus Expo. As others have said, for the price of a brand new M-A, you could get two superb CLA'd Leica M4s with vintage Leica M lenses, or two superb Leica M6s. I'm not entirely sold on the MP, and would recommend to first-time Leica users that they think seriously instead of getting a M4 or M2 - if interested in a M body without a meter and intend on using more than just a 50mm lens - or a Leica M6 if you need a built-in meter.</p>

<p>Leica M6 rangefinder camera with 25mm Zeiss ZM Biogon f2.8 lens which is my favorite combination for street photography, using Kodak TMAX 400 flim.</p>

<p>This is the first time I've read one of his reviews and I am not impressed. Nor am I enamored with his photographic technique. And of course he doesn't raise the most important question, whether it is really worth spending $3,000 in US dollars to buy a brand new meter-less film Leica M rangefinder made in the new Wetzlar, Germany plant. I handled one at Photo Plus Expo last year and I felt rather underwhelmed by it.</p>

<p>Leica M6, Zeiss ZM 25mm Biogon.</p>

<p>Afzal, none of them. I own the 28mm f2 ASPH Summicron and the 24mm f2.8 ASPH Elmarit; the 28mm f2 I'll use when I need the extra speed. As for the 24mm ASPH Elmarit, it's been sitting unused ever since I opted to get a Zeiss ZM 25mm Biogon. The lenses I tend to use most are that lens, the 28mm f2.8 Biogon, the 35mm f2 Biogon and the 50mm f2 Planar. I have also started using the 21mm f4.5 Biogon-C lens and enjoy using it a lot. Please note that I recommend getting auxiliary viewfinders for the 25mm and 21mm lenses.</p>

<p>My favorite Leica M camera is either a Leica M6, M4 or M7, depending on the situation. (In situations that require as much noise reduction as possible, then it's the M7 for me.) My favorite lenses are the Zeiss ZM 25mm Biogon, 28mm Biogon, 35mm f2 Biogon and 50mm f2 Planar. I'll use my 35mm f1.4 ASPH Summilux-M and 28mm f2 ASPH Summicron when I need to work in relatively low light conditions; otherwise, I'll use my Zeiss glass.</p>

<p>Hi Jamie, I own and use Leica M4, M5, M6, M6 TTL and M7 cameras. My favorites are the original M6, M4 and M7 in that order, with the M7 my go-to rangefinder if I want the quietest rangefinder to shoot with, though the others are reasonably quiet in their own right. In lieu of the 50mm Summicron - I have an old 50mm black Summicron made in Wetzlar, I am now using the 50mm f2 Carl Zeiss Planar. If you're looking for a cheaper alternative to the Summicron, then I highly recommend the Planar.</p>

<p>I own several 35mm Summicrons, including two of the current ASPH version. I also own the Zeiss ZM 35mm f2 Biogon and love the look of the lens, which is why I am using it, not the Summicrons. That's my own personal taste. With regards to the build quality, it's comparable with the new Leica M lenses I have seen.</p>

<p>I own both a 50mm f2 Summicron made in Wetzlar and the Zeiss ZM 50mm f2 Planar. If I need a 50mm lens, the Zeiss is my go to lens. I just like the look of the Zeiss lens a lot better than the Summicron. Haven't used the Voigtlander or the 50mm Sonnar.</p>