Jump to content

jerry_gitomer1

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. <p>I purchased a Nikon F with an older Optech strap that came with the same leather tab and round rings shown in your image.<br> I suspect that both the leather tab and the circular ring were provided with the Optech strap. <br> If I recall correctly the strap attached to the ring is used to attach the strap in a "non standard" way (at the moment I am in a wheelchair and can't go downstairs to check the camera) and the tab is to protect the body from being scratched.</p>
  2. <p>As the charts in Patrick Thrush's reply show fluorescent light is discontinuous. I was once told that if it was necessary to shoot under fluorescents to set the shutter speed to less than the AC cycle rate. In the United States we have 60 cycle current so you would shoot at 1/60th or slower. In Europe where 50 cycle is common shoot at less than 1/50th of a second.<br> The theory is that if you shoot at higher shutter speeds you will not capture a full cycle of the discontinuous light and as a result your colors will be off.<br> When shooting under fluourescents you should set the white balance in the camera to fluorescent, set your shutter speed so that you can capture a full cycle, and shoot raw so you can fix things in post processing.<br> Of course the best solution is to not shoot under fluorescent lights.</p>
  3. <p>For the Minolta lens, that is the <strong>1:1.7 </strong><em>50mm MD ø 55mm </em>[ Rokkor-X Minolta ].<br> For any lens the number following the slashed o is the size in millimeters of the filters that can be mounted on the lens. Filters were frequently used with film cameras when using black and white film in order to achieve special effects. For example a red filter will add drama to cloudy skies. <br> </p>
  4. <p>If at all possible you should hang your rugs rather than lay them on the floor. Shooting large rugs laying on the floor will result in highly distorted images (keystoning) and uneven lighting (leading to distorted colors). Ideally you should have your camera mounted in a tripod and positioned so that the lens is centered both vertically and horizontally. <br> As far as lighting is concerned, in my opinion, your best bet is to use flash rather than either daylight or constant lighting because it is more consistent (light bulbs change color value over their lifetimes while flash light values are constant from first use up to the day the flash dies). <br> As far as hanging rugs is concerned the mechanism for a shade wide enough for a pair of sliders should be able to handle the weight and are available with a geared mechanism.<br> Jerry</p>
  5. <p>If you have an unlimited budget a 105mm Micro Nikkor is the way to go. <br> If you are on a tight budget I suggest you look at a Micro Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 manual focus lens. Admittedly finding the right settings for your work can take an hour or two, but if you keep track of distances from the work as well as your camera settings you can duplicate your setup in minutes. <br> If you look at the macro photography forums you will notice that many (most?) serious macro photographers shoot in manual mode. This is because of the additional control over the results since it is the photographer rather than the camera selecting the focus point.<br> Although you didn't mention lighting it is just as important as camera and lens. You can buy an inexpensive pop up light tent (under $30) large enough for jewelry. Studio flash is great, but you can get away with a couple of inexpensive continuous studio lights (under $75).<br> If the budget permits you should also be looking at a decent tripod and a focusing rail. <br> Jerry</p>
  6. <p>If you have an unlimited budget a 105mm Micro Nikkor is the way to go. <br> If you are on a tight budget I suggest you look at a Micro Nikkor 55mm f/3.5 manual focus lens. Admittedly finding the right settings for your work can take an hour or two, but if you keep track of distances from the work as well as your camera settings you can duplicate your setup in minutes. <br> If you look at the macro photography forums you will notice that many (most?) serious macro photographers shoot in manual mode. This is because of the additional control over the results since it is the photographer rather than the camera selecting the focus point.<br> Although you didn't mention lighting it is just as important as camera and lens. You can buy an inexpensive pop up light tent (under $30) large enough for jewelry. Studio flash is great, but you can get away with a couple of inexpensive continuous studio lights (under $75).<br> If the budget permits you should also be looking at a decent tripod and a focusing rail. <br> Jerry</p>
  7. <p>I used to develop E-6 (which, if memory serves, is even more sensitive to temperature than C-41) using a large tub. I poured each of the chemicals needed into bottles which I put in the tub. I then filled the tub with hot water until the water reached the high side of the allowable temperature and followed the directions. <br> As long as you are careful in observing the proper times and temperatures for each phase of the process you will be okay.<br> <br />Jerry</p>
  8. <p>Unless you plan on printing your photos at sizes larger than 8x10 your Nikon Coolpix L22 is more than adequate.<br> What you have to work on is your lighting and the surroundings. One trick to reduce reflections from glasses is to have your subject tilt the glasses by lifting the temple bars near the ear about half an inch. This will reduce or eliminate the reflections. You can eliminate the shadow behind your subject by having the subject move away from the wall and, if you are using studio lights or a flash, by positioning your lights above the midpoint of the subjects face. One other thing that would have helped your photo would have been to have your subject in front of a light colored background so that his dark hair would have stood out from the background.<br> In addition to the book recommendation above I suggest you visit your library and study the portrait images of various photographers such as Karsh, Weston and Paul Strand. Compare how they pose their subjects, their composition, their lighting, etc.<br> The photographers I named above were active in the 1920-1960 timeframe. Their equipment was excellent in its time, but today an inexpensive digital camera is good enough to come surprisingly close in producing quality images at 8x10 or less. (Over 8x10 the larger format film cameras they used will blow away almost any DSLR image.)</p>
  9. <p>I suspect your biggest problem is lighting and not your camera.<br /> I suggest you ask your question on the lighting form and please specify which model camera you have, how you want to use the images, and be more specific about why you are dissatisfied with your images. Also, be sure to include either an image or a link to an image.</p> <p> </p>
  10. <p>Have you looked at slide copier attachments for a DSLR?<br> <br />They are both less expensive (starting at $60) and much faster (several slides per minute) than using a scanner.<br> Jerry</p>
  11. <p>Processing chromes is no more difficult than processing B&W with one exception.<br> When processing chromes you MUST keep the temperature within a narrow range. The method I used was to fill plastic tubs with water at 110F and place my containers of developer in the tubs. From start (loading the film in tanks) to finish (hanging the developed chrome film up to dry) takes less than 30 minutes.<br> When using plastic slide mounts with a little practice you can cut and mount a 36 shot roll in less than 10 minutes.<br> Jerry</p>
  12. <p>If your budget is less than $600 US the following will work.<br> Camera body: A refurbished Nikon D3200 (approx $330 from an authorized Nikon retailer)<br> Just make sure it is a Nikon factory refurbished camera body. (An authorized Nikon retailer is your best and, pehaps only, source for these.)<br> Lens: A used Series E 100MM f/2.8 (under $50 from KEH.com)<br> This is an inexpensive (due to construction - not impaired optical quaility) manual focus lens. Since you will be shooting static subjects manual focus will work well for you.<br> I like the 28MM because for photographing art because it allows you to have the camera relatively close to the art work and doesn't have the distortion the most of the wider angle lenses do.<br> Tripod: a used Manfrotto (Bogen) tripod with a 3-way pan-tilt head (you can buy these new for as little as $100 US)<br> If you are into post processing you MAY be able to get away without a tripod and use your post processing program to correct for any keystoning and/or image tilting<br> Lighting: Ideally a couple of inexpensive continuous studio lights (a kit with light stands, two lights, two softboxes and two bulbs will cost less than $170 US from B&H)<br> If you can't afford the $170 a couple of shop lights for $40 US each will work.</p> <p>Jerry</p>
  13. <p>If you are focusing on a three dimensional object the problem may due to a combination of very narrow depth of field when shooting macro and your camera not being able to isolate an area to focus on.</p> <p>The macro gurus are almost universal in stating that when shooting you should switch to manual and control where the focus point is.</p> <p>A quick test is to set up for autofocus and take a shot of a magazine or newspaper page (or even you computer screen). If AF doesn't work for the test you have an equipment problem.<br> Jerry</p>
×
×
  • Create New...