Jump to content

jerry thirsty

Members
  • Posts

    857
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Since the stabilizer is the last step, you can put it in a smaller container and then pull the film off the reel and coil it up loose in the stabilizer. I seem to recall using a magarine tub or frosting can and having just enough depth to submerge it.
  2. My Super Silette (1955 style) has the red Agfa between the windows, and a Color-Solagon lens. I don't know if there's any real difference between the Solagon and the Color-Solagon (other than marketing), but that's one more option that's out there.
  3. IMO, the lens on the DP1M isn't up to the standard set by the 2 and 3. So if your preference is for a wide-angle, you may be disappointed when you see what the sensor can do in the center of the image, and then how it falls off at the edges.
  4. I got an F3 like that a few years ago. I found that the shutter was slow, but after I dry-fired through all the speeds a few dozen times it freed up to the point of sounding correct. I never did have it CLAed.
  5. There's the Fuji GF670, which has a light meter. But as with any folding camera, there's always going to be a bit of a question whether the lens is truly parallel to the film plane.
  6. For measuring small amounts of highly concentrated liquids (e.g. Rodinal, Photo-Flo), I've always preferred to use 5-10 mL plastic syringes instead of graduates. I mark on the side what chemical each is for, and never mix them up, so I don't have to get them super clean after each use. For other liquids I usually just use 500 mL kitchen liquid measuring cups; squat and wide, so they're easier to clean than a graduate (not as accurate, but in my experience it's fine for most film/paper developers or fixers).
  7. Mine had the same problem when I got it. I eventually got it freed up by jiggling it back and forth through the range that it would move, and gradually the range expanded. IIRC, it worked best to have the lens off, so I could put my thumb on the release lever while gripping all around the ring with fingertips. Don't try to hold the exposure compensation ring still; let it turn with the ISO ring. I've found the ISO ring is more likely to skip forward if both rings are moving.
  8. Since the Fuji has a normal lens and the Sigma is a short telephoto, are you really sure you consider them to be interchangeable? The DP2M would be more comparable. Personally, even though I like physical media, I'd go with the Sigma.
  9. <p>The low resolution option for luster paper is 1440x720. There is no option to do 720x720. So if you want to look on the bright side, when you say that you want to do 720, you're already sort of halfway there.</p>
  10. <p>The original ist D had poor ergonomics (I'm thinking of the tiny display and the 4-way controller). The ist DS was much better in that regard, and would be a good cheap entry point. You'll obviously get better low light performance with more recent models. A lot of the early K10Ds had banding issues that could pop up in certain situations (mine did); I never heard that there was a firmware fix. I would agree that the K-5 is an excellent camera if you're willing to drop a few hundred $$$, however it had sensor stain issues in the early production runs, so you need to do a little homework before buying.<br> http://photorumors.com/2011/01/26/pentax-acknowledges-k-5-sensor-issues-offers-a-fix-and-an-apology/<br> A K20D will cost about 1/2 as much as a K-5 and I don't think it had the banding problem of the K10D (different sensor IIRC). But I never used one, so YMMV.</p>
  11. I haven't used the Digibase kit yet, and I'm not sure if this is the answer to your problem, but: you really shouldn't be rinsing the film in water between the steps. They are designed to work in the order stated, with some cross-mixing from step to step. And yes you can use it for Ilford C41. Finally, if you're doing two reels with inversion agitation, then you need enough chemistry to cover them. If you are using a rotary process, then your tank instructions should tell you how much you need.
  12. <p>You might be able to get a Bronica GS-1 with lens and film back for about $400. But the weight (at least according to this source) isn't going to be as light as you are looking for:</p> <p>http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-96896.html</p>
  13. <p>My memory is a little fuzzy, is EDU Ultra repackaged Fomapan? If you look at that combo there's a time for dilution F as well. Everything on MDC is best used as just a guideline; if you don't want to use continuous agitation then you could just try the same time without continuous and see how it works, or add 10-15% for a first trial.</p>
  14. <p>No more so than any photo that has the sun in the field of view. But as a general precaution, minimize the time with the lens cap off, and don't spend a lot of time staring in the viewfinder.</p> <p>Looking back at some pics I took of the partial eclipse 2 years ago, I see that I could sort of define the chunk taken out of the disk at ISO 200, F/32, 1/8000th second, with a thin layer of clouds across the sun. So you might be able to get there, depending on your weather conditions. A neutral density filter might help if you have one. If you're hoping to get the suns disk somewhat balanced with the foreground so that it's not all black, you'll have to wait until the sun is very close to the horizon, and hope there's a lot of haze to dim it (just like any sunset photo). Or composite multiple pics together.</p>
  15. Just throwing this out there: maybe the sun shining in the viewfinder and reflecting around in the mirror box?
×
×
  • Create New...