jeff_z.

<p>Sure, you're welcome!</p>

<p>Really interesting article about Eric and his life. He's made several repairs and rehab's for me and now it seems even more clear why Eric does such excellent work!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/columns/twenty-questions-eric-hendrickson-interview.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/columns/twenty-questions-eric-hendrickson-interview.html</a></p>

<p>Really interesting article about Eric and his life. He's made several repairs and rehab's for me and now it seems even more clear why Eric does such excellent work!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/columns/twenty-questions-eric-hendrickson-interview.html">http://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/columns/twenty-questions-eric-hendrickson-interview.html</a></p>

<p>Thanks very much, Craig, and sorry for the late reply! Great information for me to know and I appreciate you sharing your excellent experience! I feel lucky to be in this gallery, and I'm sure it's their reputation that's attracted the reporter's attention, but thank you!</p>

<p>Thanks so much, Mike! I think that's what I needed to understand- much appreciated!</p>

<p>Thanks, Mike, but no security concerns at the size you mention and saved at the highest quality setting?</p>

<p>I'd appreciate experienced advice regarding how high of a quality image file you would give to a newspaper reporter for use in an online article and also, for additional related publicity uses. The article is a write-up of a group show for our multi-member art gallery which the reporter wants to do. The image is one of my very best depicting a quite unusual natural scene and I've spent much time with it in order to make the best print I can. I am one of the only photographer-members; most are painters who don't seem to have any qualms sending their high resolution files to the reporter for this article (or for any other gallery use, it seems), and without any watermarking whatsoever. <br /><br />I fear I am worrying too much as I'm sure these things are very likely done all the time in other situations, but I seem to remember many discussions in the past on photo.net that would seem to warrant caution- and my general instincts regarding putting any imagery online, agrees very much. But maybe I am going off the deep end in this case of a reporter requesting them for this specific usage? If so, I still have to resolve the issue of other gallery requests for <em>"large, hi-resolution"</em> image files for gallery publicity... Many thanks in advance if you can help and it would be great if you could also include specific sizing/quality settings you might recommend for jpegs intended for these uses.</p>