Jump to content

jeff_becker

Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. <blockquote> <p>Doesn't distance to subject have something to do with how the level of blur? Where were you shooting from? the basketball player is pretty sharp.</p> </blockquote> <p>I was sitting on the baseline and the player was at mid-court on the opposite site of me so probably 60 feet. I realize that diffraction is out of the question, but was just disturbed that the bokeh was choppy....and I know that at a 60 foot distance my DoF grows a great deal and that changes my bokeh output. I agree with a lot of the input above. Curious if my photo would have looked better at 3.5 or 4.0 versus trying maximize the best out of a 2.8 shot (Steve is correct above). I know I'm pixel peeping here a little on a decent shot but I'm picky and I truly need to be....</p>
  2. <p>Loving the positive responses - very much appreciated, thank you so much!<br> Jeff</p>
  3. <p>Used a Nikon D4 with the Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 VRII lens. AF-C settings, matrix.<br> My settings were 1/1250, 2.8, ISO 3200, with Focus priority.<br> Anyway, please note the poor bokeh. I had a handful of pics turn out like this. Can't decide if the AF system reacted poor, or why I'm having some sort of Chromatic Aberration or diffraction. <br> Very displeased with this type of quality of what should be a tack sharp photo.<br> Thoughts?</p> <table > <tbody> <tr> <td><a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/x4cpo_ugzIFBnL2kZzHtQdMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=embedwebsite"><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-bcQi23r8Pwg/VrnaT9TxmhI/AAAAAAADPxo/iidLbHPZlm0/s640-Ic42/DSC_8965.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="426" /></a></td> </tr> <tr> <td >From <a href="https://picasaweb.google.com/107071309703330989429/PhotoNetTroubleshooting?authuser=0&feat=embedwebsite">photo.net troubleshooting</a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table>
×
×
  • Create New...