Jump to content

henrik_holben

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. I'm referencing several excellent YouTube videos from Ken on this D700 vs D3 Color Saturation difference: :) Plus: Nikon D700 Review - Exposure o_O
  2. Thank you very Daniel!! Appreciate very much your excellent input from your experiences with so many years using the D3X. Awesome information!! Just curious (if you can answer this?) how do you find the D3X Color Saturation compared to a D3?
  3. I'm just curious! What exactly is it that makes the Color Saturation just so Superior on the D700 compared to the D3? What is it in the firmware, filter, or? on the D3 that "kills" the Color Saturation from the D700? What precisely is it that changes the D700 Color Saturation profile on the D3? Among many Professional Portraiture photographers, the D700 is known to have much more Rich, Vivid, Intense, Tones ,even Surreal Color Saturation profile. What is it on D3 than "tones down" this Color Saturation output?
  4. Yes I agree with you! He's experimented with Aptus II/7 setup. Julio is awesome indeed!! :p
  5. Thank you very much your response very much appreciate it!! Wonderful to hear from someone with has experience directly with the DX3 in a Studio setup! Just curious: How far can you go up in ISO like 800 ISO before you notice any big Noise/Moire differences compared to your 100 ISO? I'm shooting mainly in highest range of 800-1600 ISO. You notice any D3X differences comparing to D810/D850 in overall Image Quality and Resolution when you Print Out from 8X10 to a Max of 16X20 at 300 DPI? or usual Web Display Screen Resolution Format? You have insights or experiments into this with your D3X setup? Thanks!! :)
  6. Just a Real Life Practical Question for you!! I'm comparing the two Nikon cameras D3X vs D810 with regard to Image Resolution Quality per Pixel Pitch vs Pixel Density. D3X 24,5 MP = 5,92 PP and 2,85 PD D810 36,3 MP = 4,87 PP and 4,22 PD. Which Nikon camera used only for Portraiture Studio work will produce the best Quality Prints at 300 DPI in 8X10 to a Maximum of 16X20 Framed Gallery Exhibition? Nikon D3X vs Nikon D810 Superior Image Quality?
  7. I'm just curious! Comparing Image Resolution in Pixel Pitch µm = D3X with 5,92 µm vs D810 with 4,87 µm Wouldn't the D3X then give a much more Superior Image Resolution Quality = Much Higher µm? :)
  8. Pro Intimidator Factor = Size and Look Does Matter! ;) How Big is your Gun?! :p
  9. I'm just curious if anyone have tried a Sinarback 54M on a Mamiya RZ Pro II and what is your experience and opinion about this Digital Back solution in 2018? Did you use it with the required Adapter Kit 552.45.041 for Sinarback 54M on Mamiya RZ67 Pro II, with specific Adapter Plate 552.45.241, or did you use a Mamiya HX-701 instead? How did it work? What about CaptureShop any issues running tethered into Mac? What was the Tonal/Colors Qualities and Dynamic Range of the Sinarback 54M? Its own Pros and Cons, what's Good and Bad of this setup? I'm comparing it against a Mamiya Leaf Aptus II/ Mamiya DM 22MP/33MP. What's your take with the Sinarback 54M comparing it to what's available today in 2018? Still a viable solution for a Mamiya RZ67 Pro II?
  10. Thanks Andrew. Yes, I'll definitely get the extra Grip on the D810. What I really love about the D3X is it's built like a tank it's rock-solid like my RZ67 Pro II (weight is not an issue for me with 2.5+ kilos carry around used to it) and it has this Intimidation Factor which is important issue to me too with D3X... it's big, noisy, wonderful, heavy, intimidating, like a pro...
  11. Thanks for your opinion. Another thing I didn't mention is Work Flow! This is huge issue for me, as I've been scanning everything digitally with my Epson v700, it's a great scanner love it, but it's all about the Work Flow!! That's a main crucial issue for me now in my Nikon D810 vs D3X decision eliminating a Mamiya Leaf Aptus 22/33 or Sinarback 54M Digital Back RZ67 Pro II solution...
×
×
  • Create New...