Jump to content

gungajim

PhotoNet Pro
  • Posts

    14,179
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

75 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. gungajim

    Pantanal

    For jaguars I did just fine with a 70-350 Sony E-mount on an A6300 mirrorless. In fact, my 18-200 on my A6000 worked for most shots. Jag viewing river boats typically get you within 10 to 20 yards. Biggest problem was getting a clear shot through the dense riverbank foliage. Birds weren't my main objective but I got a fair number of really nice shots with the 350. I discourage taking the 600mm especially if you need a tripod to get sharp images. Did most of my shooting from the riverboat (a dozen or so passengers and tripod isn't practical). Another big problem is that as soon as a boat finds a jag location, the guide seems to text all his guide buddies and within minutes you end up with 2 or 3 dozen riverboats jockeying for position in a narrow river tributary channel. Have fun.
  2. We agree with you that this is a big problem. Your pic should be displayed twice, your name just once. Your pic is much easier on the eye!
  3. The collapse and demise of PN has been in the cards for years. The circus has left town and no one knows where it is going.
  4. Your premium account is set to expire at the date listed above: January 2, 2020. There will be no more charges to your account. You may press the orange button above at anytime to renew & extend longer your subscription (set to auto-renew, unless you cancel again). This is some of the most poorly written, confusing copy I have ever read on a website. The extent of the damage inflicted on this site by management and technical staff is difficult to imagine. The new site never has worked and unfortunately none of problems with it ever get corrected. Even worse, new problems are regularly introduced. It is astounding to me that the owners haven't figured this out yet. In the old days, we got a regular report on fixes that had been made during the previous month and things that were being worked on currently. Unfortunately, I have 3,000 photos on the site that are difficult for viewers to access and even more difficult to re-arrange. The level of incompetence here is startling.
  5. You may look long and hard into every nook and cranny of the site and never find a user-friendly feature. You are lucky. I have 3,000 photos that I would like to rearrange.
  6. If you think that is tedious, try locating a folder when you have over 200 of them. With the old system there was a page that listed a one-line entry for each folder and it was easy to scroll down the list and find a folder. Now there are 8 or 10 folders per page and it takes a year or so to scroll through them. I still get angry when I think how user-friendly the old system was and why nothing is being done to clean up the multitude of flaws in this one.
  7. We need to pay attention to what just happened in Puerto Rico:eek:
  8. Retired countries I've visited prior to their being incorporated into their currently designated country: Bophuthatswana (to RSA in 1994); Ciskei (to RSA in 1994); Johnston Island; Nederland Antilles (to Bonaire & Curacao in 2007); Transkei (to RSA in 1994); Venda (to RSA in 1994); Berlin and GDR (to Germany in 1990). South Yemen (to Yemen in 2004)
  9. I am here for my quarterly check-in to see if the multitude of big and little problems have been fixed. Not. See you in September.
  10. Pretty girls always seem to get more timely replies than men and monkeys. Just saying...
  11. Based on info I've read on other posts in this forum, I go my Account Page to see what my setting is for automatic membership renewal. (I was auto renewed in early December but thought I had turned it off after I got bit in 12/17. I have read through the Account Page about 20 times now and I cannot find any reference to renewal of membership. Thank you.
  12. Ben, you've said as succinctly as it can be said. I don't see anyone on staff who understands the functionality that has been lost and what can be done to restore it. Instead, of fixing things that members enjoyed and used, the powers that be focus on adding piddling new little features that no one cares about. I've been around software and website development since 1971 and like to think I can evaluate a development effort. I find it totally unfathomable that the site has retrogressed despite the expenditure of several hundred thousand dollars during the past 5 years. Back in Josh's day and 3 administrators prior to him, I would regularly suggest potential enhancements to the site. It didn't always happen fast but eventually many of them were implemented and worked like a charm. I have tried to do the same for the new system at several points but the ideas are neither acknowledged or implement . So, now I check in once per month to see if the site is still there. It always is albeit, still floundering.
  13. I was auto-renewed earlier in December, although I thought I had turned it off. Now that I know where to look, I'll check it out. BTW, if you don't renew how much time passes before they consign you photos to the bit bucket. I would like to wish the PN staff Happy Holidays but every time I think about doing it, I get soooo angry. The site was so functional before launch of new version. So much time has passed with so little done to fix the problems.
  14. JDMvW I did not sense a lot of enthusiasm in your Thank You!
×
×
  • Create New...