glasslakesphotography

<blockquote> <blockquote> <p>yes, they produce lesser quality images than the more expensive models;</p> </blockquote> <p>Except that they don't.</p> </blockquote> <p>You would like to assume that the cheapest of Nikon DSLR imaging sensors is just as good as the one in the $6k D4? <br> Even though in there are considerable differences between the higher end models as well. Particularly in noise present in the image, ISO capabilities, image sharpness, and over-all quality. DPreview has a couple nice comparison tools which show differences in the quality of the standard test image. There are differences in the quality, you just have to notice them. <br> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/studio-compare<br> and the new tool at <br> http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison</p>

<p>Go film, a 35mm SLR will do wonders.<br> Yes I said it, film. A basic film camera with none of the features, bells, and whistles of modern day cameras. A point and shoot will work and get them started, but film will force them to learn patience and the underlying photographic techniques. It will teach them to value every shot, and the needless clicking away of the shutter sucks up valuable film. As they get older pick up some darkroom equipment, safety practices and technique will instill a discipline and maturity in the your photographer. If they take a passion into the art, they will have valuable knowledge that others of their generation will be lacking. <br> Just my two cents. </p>

<p>If the tripod is stable, and you trust the expensive camera on it, then use it. Test it out, see how sturdy it is in the different positions. I have heavy tripods, an old Gitzo and a newer manfrotto. They both work wonders. I shoot with the 800 as well, and the advice I can offer is to remove the vertical grip when using the tripod. I have noticed it dose not allow the camera to be held as tight to the tripod head as I would like, and causes some vibration from the shutter movement.</p>

<p>Hi Skip,<br> That is a lot of math which made my head hurt just reading it. I work with flash now and again and I operate on the basic principles of trusting TTL, and adjusting the flash compensator +/- to get what I am looking for. It is less exact, but running the numbers is a real pain in the arse. But when working with flash in a controlled setting like a portrait, a flash light meter is your best friend. If you do not have or use one then you can work by these rules:peeds<br> ISO controls all the light in the image<br> Shutter Speed controls the ambient light<br> Aperture controls the amount of flash in the image. <br> Remember that it is all about balance. Identify the overpowered or underpowered light and modify it. Shade, diffusers, ect are your friend. If the flash is maxed out then move it closer. The inverse square law applies, where doubling the distance is 1/4 the light. If you are having to use super high shutter speeds then your light source is probably too bright. Maybe lowering the ISO and toning it down will work? Like a flashlight at high noon, how useful is it? <br> Sorry that I cannot directly answer your question, but possibly changing your methodology may yield the desired results. Also I found this link. http://dpanswers.com/content/genrc_flash_calc.php<br> Hope this helps!</p>

<p>The 3100 is an entry level camera, and works just fine for those who are entering the field. Yes, they are cheap; yes, they produce lesser quality images than the more expensive models; yes, I would destroy one in an hour because they are plastic. But they are perfect to get out there and do what you need to do. When it comes to the camera body, remember that they are disposable. Your money should be getting invested into the lenses. They will last a lot longer then the camera itself. When you do go to upgrade, look for specific reasons other then wanting to take better pictures. Look at the reasons which are holding you back, if it is the limitation of the camera then you know what to do.<br> I recently upgraded to a Nikon D800, from a 6.1Mp Nikon D100. If you have never seen one, google the model. They are bricks, with a small screen. But all the controls are there at your fingertips, and it had no "modes" to speak of. I dont like modes, I like the ability to instantly change my exposures. I play a little game with people sometimes, I ask them to look at my photos and to assess which ones were taken with the 10 year old camera. They never can tell. <br> In short, be a photographer who uses their camera to create art; not one who is dependent upon it to create the art. </p>

<p>Hello all! <br /><br />I have posted before concerning my ongoing educational series. I have recently added another post to that series, this one covering the importance of post processing of digital photographs. It is not really intended to be an instructional on how to do it, but it covers some of the sciency bits to explain the necessity. Please check it out and let me know what you think. Thank you.<br> http://www.glasslakesphotography.com/importance-post-processing/</p>