Jump to content

fred_haeseker

Members
  • Posts

    297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

7 Neutral
  1. A Yashica 635, bought new in 1969. I liked the idea of being able to use 35mm as well as 120 film.
  2. I agree with orsetto; I managed to pick up an early Yashicamat (probably late '50s, Lumaxar lenses), in truly mint condition, for $100. No light meter of course, but I don't trust old built-in meters anyway. The earlier Yashicas are sturdier than the later ones, which used more plastic.
  3. I've been a user of Mike's manuals for years. When I taught b&w film photo and darkroom with an artists' society students would show up with all kinds of cameras they didn't know how to use and didn't have manuals for. I downloaded what they needed and always contributed, also for myself because I like using old film cameras. Mike provides a great service and deserves to be supported..
  4. I've found the 35/3.5 PC extremely sharp, great for quick handheld architecture shots. I use it on an FE (meter coupling released) and a Nikkormat FT3; stop-down metering on both of course. Mine looks well-used but works well.
  5. Looks like a fake. The shutter release is wrong -- the button on a Leica is smooth on top, not threaded for a cable. The collar around the button should be much shallower. It's threaded to fit a ring surrounding the button. A cable release can only be installed after the collar is removed
  6. I've found when using old cameras with non-standard shutter speeds that setting for the next slower marked speed almost always works well -- when using negative film of course!
  7. Hi Marc, I never miss your thread -- it takes me back to the equipment, techniques etc. that I recall from the time I first got interested in photography. The piece by Margery Lewis is terrific, much appreciated
  8. For me, condition is way more important than age, also mechanical soundness vs. good looks.
  9. A Mamiya 330s with 55, 80, 135 and 180mm lenses, Ilford FP4 b&w film.
  10. I use them to protect the camera back when I don't have a rollfilm holder mounted.
  11. I'm a member of the Rollei Club, just logged in without trouble. I don't know about the quality of newer compared to older models of the wides and teles; I'd love to have a wide-angle Rollei, but the price has held me back! A fast look at eBay shows a tele at $3298.49 CAD and a wide at $5932.07 CAD. Too rich for me! Not many of these were made, so they're very rare. If you can afford them, I wouldn't worry about older and newer versions; the main difference seems to be in the lenses. The older teles had a Zeiss Sonnar; the newer a Schneider Tele-Xenar; the older wides a Zeiss Distagon, the newer a Schneider Super-Angulon. As for me, I'm happy with the wide and tele lenses on my Mamiya C330s. Entirely different from a Rollei of course, but the lenses are just fine.
  12. Hello Admin, Everything seems to have fixed itself. One of those digital mysteries -- it's why I use manual cameras! Thanks for your trouble.
  13. Hello admins, I've consistently whitelisted Photo Net on Ad Block Plus -- as instructed -- multiple times but the site continues to display the request to do this. I have to refresh the page or even exit the site and reload it and go through the process again. Suggestions?
×
×
  • Create New...