Jump to content

eric_goodwin1

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. <p>Thank you for the responses. I don't mind running around with two bodies, but trying to coordinate two bodies in low-light might be a trick. And with the rental, there's always the danger of damage. <br> The suggestion of having a point and shoot handy was an idea I had overlooked - thanks! My current plan is to go simple - I will have the 24-105 around for pre-game when there is still ambient light, and then just leave the 70-200 on for the duration of the game with a PowerShot in my pocket. With the available budget I might as well have the 35L or 50L on hand for wandering the field in post-game celebration as well.<br> I appeciate the feedback! </p>
  2. <p>Hi all - first post, thanks for being gentle. <br> I'm shooting a charity sports event at a fairly well-lit field for work. I have the <strong>Canon 24-105 f/4</strong> and a borrowed <strong>70-200 f/2.8 ii</strong> at my disposal, to pair with my <strong>7D</strong>. <br> I have the budget to rent a second 7D body, and a third lens... hence my question. <br> I will be able to roam the sidelines freely, and I use the shorter focal range to capture huddles, player and coach emotions on the sidelines, team photos and ceremonial moments. Or if a play lands in my lap. <br /><br />I'm anticipating that, on the sidelines, the available light will be less predictable than on the field. I'm confident in the 70-200 for the on-field play, but not so much with the 24-105 f/4. I <em>can</em> keep a flash on the second body. <br> Would renting the 24-70 f/2.8 ii be a large improvement or should I consider adding a 35 f/1.4 or 50mm f/1.2 prime as a low-light back up for the evening? <br> There's a photo of the field in this article: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/15/on-the-soccer-field-a-roster-full-of-refugees/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0</p> <p>Thanks! </p>
×
×
  • Create New...