edgarlopes

I agree with you, and im not talking about cosmetics... Some of them had fungus inside or they were a "bit" scratched... one more thing,i did not understand quit well what you mean by this...

I think in some parts I agree with you! btw someone know if theres a big diferença between the old Canon FD 135mm 2.5 and the FDn 135mm 2.8??

the 135mm F2.8 can easily be found under 100 euros, the point is that im in Europe and with shipment + customs duties sometimes the price can go up about 2/5 of the original... I tried to look in second hand stores and photography stores but or they are in good condition and are way more expensive or they are in a lousy state... one more question: using a tripod and photographing still-lifes cannot the lack of speed of the 3.5 be overcome? I understand the advantages of the 2.8 quiet well, and probably that's the one I will buy, but still, the price diference is kinda big

thanks you for all the answers. I think I will go with a prime lens, most likely 135 f2.8 Fdn. and probably I will try out this one too, worth the risk for the price

I recently bought a canon ae-e program and this will be my second lens. My first one was the cheap Fdn 50mm f1.8. Now im search for something with a little more magnification. I was thinking about 85mm - 135mm. usually I like to take photos to static objects so I think that the aperture will not be a big problem since i can use a tripod. I was searching for something under 80 euros. do you think that the canon Fdn 100mm f2.8 is a good option? I would like a zoom lens but as far as I know is kinda hard to find a decent one at this prices, I am wrong? would FD 70-210mm f1.4 or even maybe FD 35-70mm f1:4 be any good?