dustin_baugh

<p>I think Sony's recent cameras have definitely put more pressure on m4/3, they're stolen a sizable chunk of sales. And currently the well regarded a6000 is on sale for less than the new m4/3 body that I want. But Sony doesn't have the lenses to carry the E Mount yet and M4/3 has been around long enough good 3rd party lenses are coming out.<br /><br />If Sony sticks with it and gets more lens options I can see them becoming a bigger threat in 2-3 years but right now there is no issue. But I do hope Panasonic and Olympus step up the game on their sensors to compete.</p>

<p>Like some of the others that actually have the camera have said, 8x10 will be easy, although I don't know how big you can safely go. I don't really see it doing poster sized shots unless you're willing to lose some crispness. I've done 8x10 of my LF1 (better sensor, lower megapix) and the detail of the camera was still more than the professional printers could resolve. A3 is probably the biggest I'd feel you can do without much issue.<br> But how the print will be seen makes a difference too, if it's seen from across the room larger size would still be ok. The picture you hang above a couch isn't going to have casual viewers using a loupe to inspect the quality, people won't be close enough to see the lack of clarity. If you're putting it in the hallway stick to A4 size, above the couch or mantel A3 or A2 isn't too bad.</p>

<p>I have the 14-42mm Power OIS and am looking to sell it now. It's great for how compact it is but it's a bit soft and I found I'm not willing to trade size for quality. Now that I have the 12-35mm f/2.8 that blows it out of the water I have no need for it. I hope to pair it with the 35-100 2.8 when I have a bit more money.</p>