chris_andro

I would interested in seeing a low light comparison between the D7100, D7200, and the D750. Yes, I know that would be comparing cropped and full frame, but I'd like to see just how close the D7200 is getting to FF in that respect.

Shun, Thanks for your response. Following that rule of thumb, the (12,800 iso) D750 should be good to 6,400 and my OLD D70s (1600 iso) hits it's limit at 800, which is what I've found. If the D610 and D7100 both list iso up to 6400, giving them a usable range up to about 3200, are the very similar in low light ability or are there other factors at play? If they are nearly the same in iso, would you still feel fx d610 over dx7100 is the way to go?

Thank you Kent. D7100 clean at iso 2000, is that at 2.8, or with 1.4 glass? Did I understand correctly, if I opt for the D750 I'd be good at iso 3200 with 6400 pushing the envelope, and with the D7100 I'd be good at iso 2000 with 3200 pushing it? I do have a 50 / 1.4, but for these venues I'd be using a 17-50 / 2.8 for the dx or a 24-70 / 2.8 for the fx.

I hope I'm not complicating things, but I find myself in a similar situation as the op, shooting in dark music venues. Needing to upgrade, I'm deciding between a D7100, D610, and a D750. I was wondering if anyone could tell me the differences in low light between these three bodies. I understand that the D750 would be best, but I don't know how much better it is than the other two, especially the D7100. Budget is issue. I've been using a dx body, D70, and this upgrade is long overdue. Thanks, Chris