bruto_saraccini

<p>Hi, and thank you all for the contributions. I discussed it with the lab on the phone, and I reported the different points highlighted here. They are supporting the idea of developing the roll as it is without any change in development times (against their own interest, because they could make a few extra bucks for the additional service). <br> They believe that the film has enough latitude to compensate for the "wrong stop" of exposure. <br> I will keep you posted when I have the negs to give you my impression.<br> Thanks again.</p>

<p>Hi Wouter,<br> the lab is excellent, the best in town and tested several times, I'm sure they can provide a tailored service. <br> So you'd recommend an adjustment in development time, correct?</p>

<p>I shot by mistake an entire roll of Fuji Neopan Acros 100 at 50 ISO (I forgot to change the ISO settings on the camera).<br> Shot at the seaside last week, half a roll of pictures on a cloudy overcast morning (no sun), the other half at the end of an afternoon (people portraits with sun).<br> My question is what to ask to my lab:</p> <ol> <li>to develop it normally, hoping that the latitude of the film will be enough to compensate</li> <li>to ask him to adjust, during the development process, in order to compensate for my initial mistake.</li> </ol> <p>The purpose of the first half or roll was that to convey the "moody" atmosphere of that particular morning, and the purpose of the second half was to plainly to shoot decently exposed portraits.<br> What will you do? In general I prefer slightly more contrasty pictures, but first of all I would prefer to have a negative that is not so bad from the start</p>