2mnycars

Thanks for the explanation ASA....ISO I grew up with ASA; I never understood why it was changed. Recall that every film box had a sheet or label within that explained what settings to use. Using those recommendations I finally understood. I got good at street shooting, using no meter. My used M3 was a jewel. I wish I had it still. It was stolen; the M4P I bought later never suited me and my workflow, because of my eyesight and the rangefinder. I voiced this love of the Leica M3 to a friend. He has/had more money than I. He bought an M6 and an assortment of lenses. Then he started buying digital Leicas.....he's a fine photographer. His results are incredible.

I'm really interested in this thread. It's time I found a good M3 and started shooting with film again. My M3 was my favourite camera of all time. I only had 2 lenses. 50/2.0 and 90/2.8 IIRC I live an hour away from Midland Ontario. That's where my M4P and a couple of my lenses were made.

I had the good fortune to have a profitable photo business for years; I was nationally published. My clients were very happy. You'll find none of my work now. Time goes by. I'm grateful I had a chance. Mr Karsh did a heck of a lot better than I did. Sometimes I judge a photographer by the impact they had in their day. If one of them shows me how they would find a subject, and their path to a finished product I am grateful. There are many heroes in photography. I'm recalling seeing a photo of a photographer's wagon on the edge of a battlefield, as he took daguerreotype images and worked magic there in horrible surroundings. I used to buy Outdoor Photography every month. I read every word that Galen Rowell wrote there. He had a sad end to a wonderful life that inspires me to this day. His time was up. I'm quite sure that if I had wondered into Karsh's business in Ottawa as a learning photographer, I would have been given the bum's rush. And I would have left quickly.

I understand. However, that's Coleman's opinion. I'm happy you share it. The man made a good living photographing famous subjects. That's really difficult to do, any time in history. I admire good photographers with skill, style, and good business sense. Photographers have style too. They chose how to represent their customers in the product they produce and sell.

Wonderful post. you stated your opinion well. Karsh: I went to High School in Ottawa, where Karsh worked. I've met/experienced his Brother who produced good work too. My interpretation: It's about style. I was a pro ski instructor for over 35 years. I recognized my colleagues because of their style. All experts, all the same, but different. I knew who they were when skiing, because I knew their style. Mr Karsh photographed many people well. He sold a lot. I believe Coleman was reacting to Mr Karsh's style. That's ok. I predict Mr Karsh didn't care a bit about Coleman's opinion.

I would be inclined to expose that AGFA film close to home. I would hate to see bad results come out of shooting it during an expensive trip. Your mileage may vary...just my thought.

I shot a lot of Kodachrome 10, then 25 back then. Nikon F2 photomic/F3HP photomic. Also an M3 (no meter at all, unless you had the Leica accessory...) The recommendations of the Moderator above are spot on. Sunny 16 rule is the start. You don't need a light meter. compare it to faster film...simplifying it....if you had identical cameras with same lenses, and load 10 in one, and a faster film in the other: Set the two lenses with same aperture you MUST have a much slower shutter speed with ASA 10 film, compared to any faster film. I shot many, many rolls of ASA 10, then ASA 25 Kodachrome. I often shot the Agfa colour slide film that was available. I didn't like the results shooting AGFA slide film at all. Perhaps it was the photofinishing; however, the results were no where near as good as Kodachrome developed by Kodak. I stopped using AGFA even though it was cheaper.

I was able to get parts for a Pradovit years ago; from Henry's in Toronto. If you wish any information please let me know. PM me?

I've had 2 Pradovit projectors. Still have one (uses a carousel.) DaveL Toronto

what about the laser beam affecting the eyes of critters? particularly dogs and cats!

Tiltall. But my Leica tabletop/ballhead gets more use. (Often use the little tabletop as a chest-pod.) And my Linhof monopod gets more use than that.

Thanks for this thread! I loved my Canadian F90S I couldn't stand to sell it for nothing, so I kept it. I had an 801 before it; the 90S was so much better.

Nikon F90S would be a good choice. I have no experience with an F100 You are in risky territory...watch for mold in older lenses Check your shutter speed carefully. As good camera stores die it may be harder to get good used gear. I had a Nikon 1V1 for almost 2 years. I regret selling it. If you're looking for a digital alternative, consider a used Nikon 1 V series, I'm Canadian; the situation may be different in the US.

Thanks so much! I used to talk to Philip Greenspun here; lived in London Ontario for many years. I regret we didn't meet when he visited London Ontario to pick up his Diamond aircraft.

Take a look at the Nikon 70-300 VR; mine is a delight to use. It's a little dark.... ;)