Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Home > Learn > Storing Slides, Negatives, and Photos

Storing Slides, Negatives, and Photo

by Philip Greenspun

Long Beach, California. From the deck of the Queen Mary.

  1. Top
  2. Staving Off Fading
  3. Facilitating Retrieval
  4. Photo Albums
  5. Slide Shows
  6. Mailing Supplies
  7. Richard Shiell's "How to Organize Picture Files"
  8. More


Reader's Comments

There are two important issues in slide/neg storage: (1) keeping your slides from fading; (2) ease of retrieval.

Staving Off Fading
Canyon de Chelly (northeast Arizona). Before you embark on a storage project, you ought to read The Preservation and Care of Color Photographs. Briefly, slides and negatives will fade. They will fade faster if they are hot and/or humid. They will fade faster if they are interacting with any chemicals.

You want your images to be in a room that is air-conditioned in the summer. You want them to be surrounded by polyethylene or polypropylene or acid-free paper. You want everything encased in a steel cabinet or acid-free paper box.

Facilitating Retrieval
I love lateral files and hanging folders. I even drove to Alaska with four plastic crates of hanging folders in my minivan. The best filing cabinets are made by Steelcase. You can special order them in non-ugly colors, e.g., really white white. They are expensive but last forever and roll beautifully. Wood filing cabinets might look better but the chemicals in the wood and glue will eat your images.

Tug of war. Seattle, Washington. I use the special 42" wide Steelcase laterals that can be used to front-to-back file three rows of "letter sized" hanging folders. Regular Pendaflex folders are made of a nasty green-looking cardboard that I presume contains plenty of acid. Archivists use the plastic Pendaflex "Ironhide" folders which are available at full-line office supply houses. These are manufactured for standard office use because they are more durable than cardboard folders but as it happens they are made with a reasonably good plastic for image storage.

My basic filing system is chronological. If I make dupes of images, I put them in a separate folder next to the originals.

Bernese Mountain Dog and Labrador. Seattle, Washington. I put all of my slides into archival plastic slide-saver pages, 20 to a page (pages are available from Adorama). This is key because I can lay down a page on a light table and scan it quickly to find the slide requested by a magazine or whatever. As I stuff the slides in, I use a Sharpie pen to mark the plastic with names of people and places. If the roll is unrelated to any others, I stick a plastic hanging spine through the back of the page and just hang it in the cabinet. If there are 10 rolls of the same subject, which implies 20 pages, then I dump them all into a plastic Pendaflex folder.

I leave 35mm negs and proof prints in the packaging used by the photo lab. I aggregate them into hanging folders by subject. If I have an orphan roll or two then I put them into a folder labelled "October 1996".

If I have an extra 8x10 print, I file it along with my slides and negs. I file larger prints in archival cardboard boxes (available from Adorama). However, the correct way to file large prints is in a steel architect's "flat file".

Photo Albums
Now that I've become obsessed with Web publishing, I don't tend to make photo albums. However, my favorite way to make albums is to use loose leaf binders and achival paper from Light Impressions. They make a really huge notebook and page set that can comfortably accommodate four 4x6" proofs on one page. I use a 3M Adhesive Transfer Gun to stick the photos to the pages. This system is permanent and therefore not loved by achivists but it is chemically inert so it won't eat your pictures. There are some newer systems that are repositionable that I'd like to try but haven't. Light Impressions sells moby plastic sheets to wrap around these album pages but I don't like them. I want a clear view of my photos with no intervening plastic. If you decide to go plastic-free, you may have to kick people who put their grubby paws directly on the prints, though.

I don't use interleaving sheets to separate the photos on opposite pages but I guess I probably should. I live in Massachusetts where it gets moderately humid in the summer but after about five years haven't had any problems with photos sticking to each other.

Slide Shows
If you want to do a slide show, it is best to make dupes of all the slides and leave the originals in the plastic pages. A Kodachrome will fade after one hour of projection; a typical E6-process slide will fade after two or three hours of projection. There is nothing wrong with leaving originals in slide trays, but it makes retrieval of specific images tough. Be certain to label the outside of the boxes in which you keep the slide trays. Otherwise, you'll be searching for hours to find a particular slide. Also, stamp your name, address, and phone number everywhere you can. There is nothing more depressing than losing a Carousel full of originals.

Mailing Prints
For envelopes and packaging materials to mail photographic prints, contact American Printing and Envelope Company (APEC) at 45-12 Davis Street, Long Island City, NY 11101, (800) 221-9403.

OK, that's all that I have to say. The next section is authored by a professional stock photographer...

Richard Shiell's "How to Organize Picture Files"
As a stock photographer with about 50,000 slides I've been forced to learn to organize picture files.

First you'll need to store your pictures safely. Choose either archival (non-acid) boxes or polypropylene (not vinyl) ring binder pages. Non-archival paper boxes leak acidic vapors, and vinyl pages leak volatile softening agents that can make the film emulsion stick to the page.

Ring binder pages can be stored either in binders or in hanging files. Ordinary hanging files hold about ten pages each.

Each picture should have a unique serial number. This is important for identification whenever a picture is sent out. The easy method is for the first picture to be numbered 1, the thousandth picture to be numbered 1000, etc. A useful alternative for those who shoot several identical frames (in-camera dupes) is a double serial number; in-camera dupes share the same serial number, and have individual second numbers (say, 1000-1, 1000-2, 1000-3, etc.)

There are two methods for organizing picture files, either by subect or by serial number. Each has it's own advantages. Whichever you use it's a good idea to keep separate files for prints and slides.

Subject files are preferred by stock agencies and most stock photographers. It works like a library or book store; general sections divided by subject or location. For example, a picture with the caption "Boulder with Map Lichens in Autumn Field, William O'Brian State Park, Minnesota, USA." would be found in the William O' Brian State Park file among the Minnesota files of the picture library. Or an Iceland Poppy would be found under P (for Papaver nudicaule, the Latin name) within the Annual and Perennial Plants section of the Plants files.

A sampler of subject file headings:

  • Countries, divided by states or regions, subdivided by cities, national and state parks, undeveloped land, seacoasts, etc.
  • Transportation, divided by planes, trains, automobiles, etc.
  • Occupations, divided by medicine, fire fighters, police, construction workers, etc.
  • Children, divided by infants and toddlers, small children, teenagers, subdivided by behavior or location, such as play, school, doctor's office, etc.
  • Sports, divided by sport, subdivided by team and player.
  • Climate, divided by Clouds, Rain, Hail, Frost, Floods, etc.
  • Animals, divided by Birds, Mammals, Herptiles, Sea Life, Insects, and misc, subdivided by genus and species.
  • Plants, divided into Wild and Domestic, subdivided as Trees and Shrubs, Perennials and Annuals, Water Plants, Vines and Climbers, Fungi and Lichens, etc., subdivided by genus and species.

As the picture library grows the subject files get divided into more and more precise categories according to the number of pictures of each subject. Fifty pictures of roses could be lumped together in a comprehensive "rose" file, but 1000 pictures of roses would need to be subdivided (either alphabetically or possibly into groups like Miniatures, Hybrid Teas, Species Roses, Floribundas, Climbers, Shrub Roses, Antique Roses, etc.).

Generally flora and fauna pictures submitted for publication need to be labelled with Latin name and common name (and location, serial number, and photographer's name). Flora files are typically alphabetized by Latin names, wheras for fauna either Latin or common names are useful. Lettered files can be grouped (A-D, E-F, etc.), or each letter can have it's own page or divider. The pictures within each lettered page or box need not be alphabetized (all the A's can be lumped together), but any subject for which there are over a dozen pictures (Iris, Felis, or whatever) should have it's own page or divider. A subject file kept in binder pages should have each page labelled.

The basic guideline for a subject file is (in the words of Marv Dembinsky, a stock agent) "make the files fit the way clients request pictures". If you get a lot of requests for baby animals then you should have a baby animals file.

Characteristics of subject files:

  • Fastest retrieval of multiple diverse images to fill client requests.
  • Photo research takes place in the files.
  • A database is optional for picture research. Most pictures can be found without consulting a database.
  • Takes more time than serial number files to set up, especially when dividing categories as the library grows.

Setting up files organized by serial number is easy; slide number 1 is in the first position, and number 1000 is in the thousandth position.

Finding pictures in a serial number file requires a cross-referenced database, like the card catalog at the library (I'd recommend using a computer). If you want to find a picture of a boulder in a meadow do a keyword search for "boulder" and "meadow". Many ready-to-use database software packages are available, and even a text editor with multiple keyword searching will suffice. (I use Kedit, a text editor with a macro programming language).

Characteristics of serial number files:

  • Fast and easy to set up.
  • Picture research takes place in a database.
  • Relatively slow retrieval of multiple diverse images.

Database searching can be expedited by using subject codes. I use a two-letter code, and incorporate it into the serial number, i.e. 1000-EG-3. Sometimes two codes are necessary; 1001-HK(CK)-3 would depict two subjects, maybe a Monarch butterfly on a Purple Coneflower. The first letter covers 26 broad categories (choose your own. Mine are tailored to the subjects I shoot). The second letter subdivides each category. You could use three or four letters. Say you have a code for shorebirds. A database search for that code and, say, "Oregon", would return all your Oregonian shorebirds. If you use subject files the code indicates where to file the picture.

No matter how a picture library is organized it's important to find the time to file pictures as they return from clients or from processing. If several months go by and hundreds of pictures haven't been put away, well, it's an invitation to misplaced pictures or lost sales.

More


Readers' Comments


Add a comment



Ray Albright , April 15, 1998; 06:02 P.M.

Thought I'd share my numbering system for slides and photos. I use a code made up of the year, month, day and a sequence number for the roll, e.g. 980313-3 is the third roll shot on 13 Mar 98. I bought a rubber stamp at an office supply store and stamp that number on the back of a print or the border of the slide. On the print I ink in the negative number that the print is from. I put the control number on a label that is stuck to the page holding the negatives.

I also created a spreadsheet where I list the pertinent data such as when and where and describe each negative or slide. I do a lot of underwater photography and there is no way I can remember all of the types of fish and other critters. The spreadsheets are saved using a filename the same as the control number. A master log provides a quick reference to get me to the right spreadsheet.

Matthew Endo , December 02, 1998; 09:16 P.M.

One note, the URL for Light Impressions is:

http://www.lightimpressionsdirect.com/

Christophe Pettus , December 31, 1998; 03:09 P.M.

Esselte (the parent of the Pendaflex and Oxford brands) seems to be going out of their way to make the Ironhide line of plastic hanging folders hard to find. They're not mentioned on their web site, nor in the marketing collateral that they send out to most stationery stores. Even good, non-chain stories (like Patrick & Co. here in San Francisco) have often never heard of them, or only their file-folder equivalents.

They do exist, however. The item numbers for the hanging folders start 725xx; xx varies depending on the color. 11 is red, the color I use; since the special-order catalogs from most stationery distributors are sorted first by manufacturer and then by item number, you can find the other colors easily enough. Given this, just about any non-chain stationery store can order them. Chains have massive centralized buying operations which would suffer massive structural failure if a box of paperclips that was not on their massive centralized buying list arrived at their warehouse unexpectedly.

Martin Reber , September 10, 1999; 01:19 P.M.

For many years I have used a numbering system similar to Ray Albright's. Each roll gets a roll number consisting of year-month-sequential roll number within the month-frame number, like this: 990901-xx. Obviously, even this manual system has a Y2K problem <grin>. I also keep a companion written log that lists each roll by number, including film type,ISO, size and a description of what's on the roll. Usually there is not a significant diversity of subjects on an individual roll, so more granular descriptions of each frame haven't been a real necessity. However, over the years I have accumulated a large collection and have begun converting my best shots to digital ... and now I have a new set of requirements for storage & retrieval.

So, for the past year+ I have been researching photo database/digital asset management software ... and so far, the search has had disappointing results. Anyone have some recommendations based on experience with these or other products?

Here's a summary of what I've looked at so far:

The high end programs, like Embark, MediaWay and MediaBank, are intended for museums and art collections and are only for the price-is-no-object folks.

In the mid-tier, there are four decent products:

Extensis Portfolio. Pleasant UI. The main screen shows catalogs/galleries in left pane, thumbnails in the right pane. Highly customizable database fields and keywords. Searching uses drop-down boxes and boolean operations; and it will parse keyword sequences when evaluating searches. Support for lots of formats, including Flashpix and Photoshop 5. (Client edition is $199; server edition is $2499)

ImageAxs. The most database-like of these programs. Has a pleasant UI showing your catalog tree in the left pane and either thumbnails or a complete image in the right pane. Unfortunately, they reserved the most important features for the Pro version only (at $299) - customizable database fields, contact sheets, multiple portfolios and web page generation. DASC recently sold ImageAxs to Caere, but it's too early to tell if that means good things or not. ($69 for the basic version)

Cumulus. The current version has been around for quite some time. Has 15 fixed database fields but also has user-defined categories; searches can be done on either. Unfortunately, it still doesn't support Flashpix and is stuck at Photoshop 3. A new version (v5) is around the corner, but the Cumulus system was already complex and v5 will only be moreso. This product is really intended for workgroups, not individuals.

Mabango. Funky is the word to describe this program. They make a big deal out of adhering to AACR2 cataloging rules, but if you look at the program you have to wonder how useful it really is if you're not a librarian. The main screen isn't as elegant as Extensis Portfolio or ImageAxs, customized database fields are basically nonexistent (limited to content in a pre-defined freeform db field), searches are not nearly as flexible as Extensis and it currently does not support Photoshop 5 files. But probably just the right thing if you require AACR2. ($99.95)

On the low end, three programs stand out somewhat from a field of otherwise useless photo-album products:

AxisSoft PhotoBase. Has an impressive user interface and provides up to 24 user-customizable categories, but it imports all your photos into its own database; can you imagine how big the mdb file must get. It also has limited format support, and doesn't support Flashpix, native Photoshop or Picture Publisher files at all. ($49.95)

Ixla Explorer. The user interface is a basic directory-tree-like left pane with a right pane that can be either thumbnails or full image. Downside is that its search capability is limited to selection of category or keywords. ($29.95)

Photosoft Photo Explorer. Basically the same as Ixla Explorer except that thumbnails are displayed as slides on a light table and the price is $149.

Bryan Johnson , September 18, 1999; 12:20 P.M.

Ray Albright's system isn't Y2K compliant...

David Bessey , November 04, 1999; 10:42 A.M.

"Ray's system is not Y2k compliant":

True, but it could be. I use an "abbreviated" form of date information, and had to deal with this problem. For instance, I am writing this on 1999 November 04 Thursday. The "code" for this is 9b04h. This is: 1999, the 11th month, the 04th day, 'h' for Thursday. (T is Tuesday, s is Saturday, u is Sunday. The rule on the day letters is "first come first served.)

So what about Y2k?? 'a' through 'z'. For those a bit younger than I, use 'A' through 'T', then 'a' through 'z'. (A through T so that the lowercase-letter years are twenty plus the letter's value.)

So a101_ means 2000 January first, day unknown. (I am too lazy to go look.)

*****

I (plan to) serial-number my photos as 0000 through 9999 relative to >>when they were taken<<. So, if I switch between color, B&W, other speed films, polaroid, whatever, all photos from a given location are stored together.

Well, Food for thought, anyway. Dave

Marty Lyons , November 05, 1999; 07:17 A.M.

Just a personal aside about not delaying in getting your material properly stored. After ten years of "I really have to get my original negatives into proper storage sleeves", I finally ordered a bunch of archival material from Light Impressions and got to it. As I started removing some of the negatives from the material the lab put them in, many rolls had stuck to the plastic. Then I got educated. Unfortunately, it was years too late. Now I've learned the hard way about ferrotyping, which is the fancy term for what happens when the top coat of emulsion sticks to a surface and peels off. The outcome is that some of your irreplacable work may be forever ruined (in my case, photos of the South Pole, a place it's doubtful I'll ever see again). Now when I get work back from the lab, it's immediately sleeved in archival Mylar and placed inside proper storage boxes. But what an expensive lession. Kodak also has some very helpful comments in this Technical Publication.

Rolf Rosing , December 21, 1999; 04:22 P.M.

My system of numbering slides, negs and series is a bit long, but very detailed. I thought i'd share it here. My latest roll of film was numbered: 1999.12.04.AA.KN/36, one particular photo fom this film would be (the best one ;-) 1999.12.04.AA.KN#23 (neg. no. 23 as you will probably understand) Well, 1999 is ofcourse the year, 12 the month, 04 is the serial number of film (sometimes i use more than one film a day, sometimes i use less, so i decided not to put in the day in my registration number). AA is for the sheet in my archive, sometimes a film will not fit into one sheet, so i can use A1, A2 for different sheets of one film. Sometimes i use more than one film for one subject, so i the letters will show: BB is the second film and sheet of this and that subject. If (and that also happens) one subject has more films AND the films will not fit into one sheet, the numbering will be: A1, A2, B1, B2 etc. etc. KN stands for colour negative (in my language it is "Kleuren Negatief", sorry, my system isn't international yet...), KD is colour slide, ZN is b/w neg, ZD is b/w slide and MN is monochrome neg. CD is cross-processed slide (slide to neg) and CN is cross-processed neg. (neg to slide). Well, the final number with a slash (/) stands for the ammount of exposures in the film: 36 for normal 35mm. film, 12 for 120 roll and 72 for 35mm film that i used with my half format Petri camera. (My verrrry inferior, but happy Lubitel TLR isn't very happy with 220 film, so 24 isn't a code i use very often). If the final number has a #, it means that it is the neg or slide number (one single picture) Maybe this is a little helpful info, i use it with a simple but handy DOS database (MNFile, old but you can customize EVERYTHING) in my computer. Searching specific pictures is quite easy and fast. Also when single slides or prints are being send out of my archive, it is always easy to file them again, once i get them back.

Keith Shearon , February 05, 2000; 11:53 P.M.

For what its worth I have a different numbering scheme. Its similar to the others and is based on CTO "configure to order" used in manufacturing/engineering environments. I shoot a lot of motor racing. And I keep a calender of where I was on a given weekend so I know the event the photos refer to.

Image Serial Number Example: 090999R12F32N537A

Decoded: Sept. 9, 1999 - Roll 12 Frame 32 - Number 537A The last set: N537A is the competition number of the subject which is #537 Amateur. Other subject codes could be substituted.

As I shoot more subjects, undoubtedly names will get longer. This has been a problem for some UNIX systems that use programs that automatically truncate file names using a tilda. I haven't experienced the truncation problem with NT 4.0.

David Lee , February 29, 2000; 12:38 P.M.

After sending email to esselte.com, they told me:

"Those folders are carried by Boise Cascade Office Products and you can try Valueamerica.com. Both can be found on the Pendaflex.com website under Ordering and Links."

I just looked at Valueamerica.com, you can get them in a set of 25 for 15.49, shipping included.

Vadim Makarov , June 26, 2000; 08:04 A.M.


Form header

I made a printed form to keep my notes about subject, time, location, tech info, comments, etc. Although I am filling it in as I shoot, it may also be useful for those who prefer to write everything down later.

Finished forms become a part of my archival system: they are filed away and can always be referred to later. The link above also contains comments about slide numbering I use.

Michele Shea , July 07, 2000; 05:16 P.M.

Even though I am involved in care and preservation of library materials in my work, it was not until the last few weeks that I took a look at four huge "magnetic" albums I had neatly kept my own family photos in between 1979 and 1988 or so. After this period I used more care in selecting archival plastics (and never "magnetic" pages) in albums. Upon examination, I find that pictures which had faded to a blueish or reddish tinge were right in the same time-frame and maybe right next to pictures which look great. I started taking them up and looking at the back of each photo. ALL KODAK PAPER prints (and these are comsumer prints from various labs) are in great shape. All others vary. Some are good and some are not and all faded or discolored prints are devoid of names on the back of the print. This is good enough for me. Twenty-one years of testing I didn't even mean to do. The photos are now being triaged and remounted in archival materials.

David Truog , November 12, 2000; 12:02 P.M.

Comments about 1) serial numbers, 2) image cataloging software, and 3) automatic serial numbering.

1) The convention I decided to use makes for long serial numbers, but then I use software to do it automatically, so it's actually easier to read, but not labor-intensive. Here's the template: yyyymmdd-hhmmss-nnx. The first eight digits are the date in the obvious order. The next six digits (after the dash) are the time, using 00 through 23 for the hour. Then "nn" is a sequence number between 01 and 99, for when I took more than one image in a second. Then "x" is an optional sequence letter (lowercase) between a and z, for when I create digitally edited versions of the original image or scan. (The original does not have a sequence letter at the end.)

2) The best software I have found for cataloging images is iView Multimedia. It builds thumbnails of the images, but lets you store an image in multiple catalogs to reflect its relevance to multiple categories. It runs slide shows of a catalog. It launches helper apps like PhotoShop easily. It can automatically rename files based on sequence numbering. Most operations can be done to one image or to a set of images, using a "Mark" (multi-select) feature. Its interface is very easy to use. it's scriptable (this makes a huge difference). It's cheap (about US$30). See <http://www.iview-multimedia.com/>.

3) I have now switched to using a digital camera almost exclusively. Most digital cameras (certainly my Nikons, a CP900 and a CP990) store the date and time when the photo is taken in the image file, along with other data about aperture, shutter speed, etc. You can then use software to extract that info (sometimes called EXIF data). I wrote a simple script to extract the data and time info and rename the file based on the template I describe above, adding the sequence number, which is usually 01 unless I used the camera's Continuous mode (the digital equivalent of a motor drive). Then, every time a create an edited version of the image (for example using PhotoShop), I save the edit with the sequence letter I mention above -- a, then b, then c, and so on. I do the same thing with scans, except that I name the files manually.

Chris Sullivan , May 29, 2001; 01:01 A.M.

I use a similar system to the "form" that was posted above, with one key difference. I print out forms en masse using Word, and have it print in a fairly large font on the back the serial number on the front. The first exposure I take is of the back of this form, usually with some hand-written notes (like what camera I was using, and the date). This way, if I drop a handful of rolls off at the lab, it's trivial to match up the negatives (and the prints in the envelope!) to the out-of-band data on the form. This way, every roll of film I shoot has a unique serial number that (importantly) stays with the negatives and the prints. While you lose one exposure per roll to this system, when you're shooting 36 exposure rolls what's one exposure?

Jeff Johnson , June 11, 2001; 04:37 P.M.

One other database I know if is Agave SPS by Rosette Software. It is aimed at professionals, especially stock shooters with large files. The program was developed by Randy Prentice. Website is www.prenticephoto.com/agaveweb.htm . It offers a good range of functions for stock file management and submission set up and tracking.

John London , September 10, 2001; 04:21 P.M.

Re Data Base Management Software for slidebased filing, I found a couple of years ago a company called 'SPANSOFT'. They are/were based in Glenrothes, Scotland, UK. Two systems were available, one for medium size files with a base including headings of Prefix, ID, Title, Keywords, Quality Rating, Date,& Notes which are all user adaptable. The second being a more professional system with more facilities (?). I have to add I am unaware if they are still supplying these systems, but this may be what some are looking for. Hope it helps! Regards John London based in the UK

Justin Winokur , December 12, 2001; 05:41 P.M.

I just assign every roll a number according to the order in which I develop them. An example would be if that roll is the 15th to be developed and the number under the negative is 21. the picture would be 15.21. For slides I do the same thing except I write the number on the frame in any order. In the back of the proof sheet and the negative pages or the slide pages I write the type of film and the date it was developed. On the back of all my prints I write their ID number. If I feel like it I keep a log of enlargements so I don't have to redo the timing. This system has worked for me and other fellow photographers. I hope it works for you. Its great. If you have any questions you can email me by clicking here or emailing me at Jwink@www.com. Will you please take a look at some of my photos and critique them. Thanks. My Photos

Fazal Majid , December 25, 2002; 02:33 A.M.

The best software I know of for asset management (pompous name for image catalog software) is IMatch. It has a very powerful category management system that I have a tutorial for. Categories (they are actually sets as in mathematical set theory) give you the flexibility of associating an image with multiple categories (not possible with a subject-based classification) while avoiding the high overhead of keyword-based systems.

For Mac users, the equivalent is Kavasoft Shoebox

Lisa T. , January 05, 2003; 05:20 P.M.

For a full line of archival products check out PrintFile Archival Storage (http://www.printfile.com/). They produce very extensive lines of archival products (I noticed that Light Impressions also carry some of PrintFile's products) for print, negative, slide, etc. storage. You can order on-line directly with Print File or also from Get Smart Products (http://www.pfile.com/), who also carries the full Print File product line and other products. I've ordered my PrintFile products from Get Smart and am very happy with their service.

Michael Miller , January 27, 2003; 11:47 A.M.

With the agressive campaign to move to digital cameras, doesn't slide storage become a moot point (or will in the near future)? I know that submitting slides is still customary, but I don't believe that it will take too much longer before digital files are accepted by most publishers. Don't get me wrong, I still store my slides but I also scan every slide. Hard drives are becoming bigger and cheaper each year which means you can still have a high res scan (65mb?, 135mb?). Thoughts?

Jason Antman , August 29, 2003; 08:39 A.M.

Right now I use PrintFile sheets for everything from 35mm to 8x10 sheet film. That's going to start changing, due to advice, scratches, and an ever-growing archive. My plan, after lots of suggestions (all from Light Impressions): for sheet film, Polypropylene Interleaving Folders, inside of Balanced Seam Envelopes. A few folders per envelope. These are then stored in Archival boxes, in some logical order. roll film - films in some kind of envelope like the InfoFlap, with paper (Apollo) between strips. These go in one of their FilmBin boxes.

As to organization, I use detailed shot sheets that show exposure and subject information as well as time and date for every frame on each roll. These are cataloged into an Access database on the computer. The same for sheet films except they have a longer sheet, something like Adams' suggested one in The Negative, but a bit more detailed.

I also use Access for a copy of my printing log, a list of what film I have in stock, and a "to do" database of film to develop and prints to make.

NOTE: If you go the digital route, make sure you have adequate backups. A RAID configuration would be nice, but something on tape or CD stored ina fireproof box would be good too.

Ed Matthews , October 08, 2003; 10:13 P.M.

For a decent product for digital images that's windows only, BR-Software has Photoarchiver that allows assigning multiple categories to collections of photos and more. Easy to use. Flexible. Cheap.

Andrew Wolf , March 11, 2004; 04:16 P.M.

The best system I have found for storing lots of slides is the slide cabinets from slidestoragecabinets.com. They store over 2,000 slides each, and can be stacked on top of each other for more storage. Certainly its the most cost effective means of storage that I've found, and they work well.

pepino pepino , November 23, 2004; 12:56 P.M.

pepino resimleri

Image Attachment: DSCI0042.JPG

Svein Wisnaes , August 19, 2005; 10:31 P.M.

My storage system is totally digital and based on Fotostation, a system that many big newspapers use, but it also exist as single user systems. The nice thing is that it uses IPTC and EXIF for storing the data. Not external database. So if you update the pictures before burning them on a CD or DVD, all the info will follow the file. You can find it on http://www.fotostation.com/ .

david porter , April 09, 2007; 07:17 P.M.

I found this site: www.togetherbook.com you simply send your photos in and they will bind up to 100 photos for $30. I also have a valid coupon code for 10% off: SPRING07

I received my book in about a week after sending my photos in. The quality is excellent! Would make a great proof book as well!

Cheers!

Sue Shultz , November 11, 2007; 11:52 P.M.

Being a newbie to this forum, I need help! I need to ask about scanning 35mm slides into my computer so that I can print them out to frame for wall hangers. How do I get to such a forum to ask that question? Thanks,

Sue Shultz , November 12, 2007; 10:17 A.M.

Never Mind, Thanks anyway, I finally found a forum in which my questions have been asked and now I need to understand the answers. Old dogs can learn new tricks though.

Craig Britland , February 07, 2008; 04:45 P.M.

BTW, www.ClearBags.com has the largest selection of Crystal Clear Bags in the world. These are ideal when you want to Promote, Protect, and Preserve your work. Good luck!


Add a comment



[ top ]