Welcome to Photo.net: A Community of Photographers

Home > Equipment > Canon > Canon EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM Review

Canon EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM Review

by Bob Atkins; created 2005

In September of 1995 Canon introduced a revolutionary new lens, the EF 75-300/4-5.6 IS USM. The revolutionary aspect of this lens was the incorporation of an optical image stabilizer system which allowed the lens to be hand held at shutter speeds two stops slower than could be done with a conventional lens. Optically the EF 75-300/4-5.6 was very good at the wide end, but became a little soft at 300mm, especially when used wide open. In fact the lens wasn't bad - I've actually used one for the last few years - but at 300mm it paid to shoot at f8 and tweak up the resulting image in PhotoShop. The EF 75-300/4-5.6 IS USM was reviewed here on photo.net in February 2003: http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/75-300IS/

Then in June of 2004 Canon introduced a somewhat similar lens, but this time using diffractive optics (DO). The result was significantly better performance at 300mm in terms of sharpness, though some users reported optical effects from the diffractive optics could cause undesirable image effects under some circumstances. The EF 70-300/4.5-5.6 DO IS was smaller, but heavier than the EF 75-300/4-5.6IS USM and it also used a true ring USM motor with full time manual focus and a dual mode IS system which allows horizontal panning. The EF 70-300/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM was reviewed here in June 2004: http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/70-300do/

The most recent incarnation of the original IS lens, the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM was introduced in October 2005. While being physically very similar to the original lens (within a few mm in size and a few gm in weight), there were some optical and mechanical differences. The EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM is 5mm wider at the wide end, uses a single UD glass element, and has a revised AF system (though it still uses a micro USM motor rather than a ring USM). It also has a zoom lock at the 70mm position to prevent "zoom creep" while the lens is being carried and it has a dual mode 3rd generation IS system which allows horizontal panning.

Here's a short summary of the specifications of these three lenses:

Lens 75-300/4-5.6
IS USM
70-300/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM 70-300/4-5.6
IS USM
Introduced September 1995 June 2004 October 2005
Original Price 88,000 yen 174,000 yen
(w/case and hood)
88,000 yen
Approx price as of October 2005 $450 (discontinued) $1150 $650
Motor Micro USM Ring USM MicroUSM
IS panning mode No Yes Yes
Full Time Manual Focus No Yes No
Lens Construction (group) 10 12 10
Lens Construction (element) 15 18 15
No. of Diaphragm Blades 8 6 8
Minimum Aperture 32-45 32-40 32-45
Closest Focusing Distance (m)
1.5 1.4 1.5
Maximum Magnification (x) 0.25 0.19 0.26
Filter Diameter (mm) 58 58 58
Maximum Diameter x Length (mm) 78.5 x 138.2 82.4 x 99.9 76.5 x 142.8
Weight (g) 650 720 630

EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM Performance

I've been working with the new lens for about a week now and here's my take on it so far.

Autofocus

The AF is certainly faster than that on the original EF 75-300/4-5.6 IS USM. I measured a time of approximately 0.65 seconds for the lens to go from infinity focus to closest focus. This compares to 0.9 seconds for the original lens. The turnaround time is faster too, i.e. if the lens goes from infinity to close focus and doesn't find focus, it will pause and then go from close focus back to infinity. The cycle time for the new lens is 1.6 seconds, while the old lens took 2.6 seconds.

Manual Focus

The manual focus feel of the new lens is essentially the same as the original lens, i.e. sloppy and undamped. This isn't a lens you'd want to use manual focus with unless you had to. Fortunately, autofocus seems fast and accurate, so resorting to MF isn't something that will be required often.

Image Stabilization

Canon claim that the new IS system gives an extra stop of "handholdability". This is very difficult to measure since when handholding a lens with IS there is a certain probability of sharpness, i.e. at the longest shutter speeds not every shot will be equally sharp. However I can say that visually (i.e. looking through the lens), the IS system does seem more effective and in practice when shooting in the 1/60-1/90s shutter speed range at 300mm, the new lens gave a somewhat greater percentage of sharp shots than the original lens, so Canon have certainly improved the IS. Is it a full stop better? Maybe. As I said it's something that's quite difficult to quantify. However there's zero doubt that it works! Below are 6 shots taken at 1/125s, 3 with IS on and 3 with IS off.

is.jpg (32104 bytes)

Sharpness

The original lens was very sharp at 70mm (as is the new lens), but became softer when zoomed to 300mm and shot wide open. I typically tried to shoot at f8 if I was zoomed out to 300mm. The performance of the new lens is improved at 300mm. Both sharpness and contrast are increased and it's possible to shoot wide open at 300mm and get good results. It's not as good as a 300/4L, but then nobody could reasonably expect it to be. Canon's published MTF data suggests that it should be as sharp as the more expensive 70-300/4.5-5.6 DO (diffractive optics) lens and I can believe that - though I did not have a DO lens available for a side by side comparison so I can't say for sure.

Below are 100% crops taken from the center of images shot using and EOS 20D wide open at 300mm.

300_center.jpg (37590 bytes)

Contrast and Flare

Under normal conditions contrast seems a little higher with the new lens. Again this is something that's hard to quantify, but qualitatively, I think it's better. Flare also seems slightly better controlled, although like almost any lens, and certainly any consumer lens, if you have the front element in direct sunlight, you will have flare and contrast problems. A lens shade (or a suitably positioned hand or hat) is the only effective way of reducing flare under those circumstances as dramatically shown below:

flare.jpg (26886 bytes)

Chromatic Aberration

CA (chromatic aberration) is still visible in the new lens, just as it was in the original, but the magnitude and intensity of the colored fringes is slightly lower. Again, not as good as a 300/4L, but again, you wouldn't expect it to be.

Build Quality

Build quality is similar to that of the original lens. It's a consumer zoom, not an "L" series lens. That's not to say that it's flimsy, but there is some barrel wobble when extended to 300mm. The addition of the zoom lock at 70mm is useful, since the lens will extend to the 300mm position when carried on a camera and pointing downwards.

Overall Conclusions

The new EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM is a better lens than the original EF 75-300/4-5.6 IS USM, as it should be since it costs at least $200 more. $650 isn't cheap, and in fact it's more expensive than the EF 70-200/4L. The original lens has been discontinued, so the decision as to which is the better value of the two is now moot. Maybe you can still find a new one, but it's getting tough. Used ones sell on Ebay for around $400. I'd say the new lens at $650 is probably better value than the DO lens at $1150, as long as you can live without a silent ring USM motor and full time manual focus and don't mind the extra 1.5" in length. If you shoot at 300mm a lot, I'd say pay the price for the EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM. If you shoot most of the time at the shorter end, you can save $250 or so by getting the original lens used (or maybe you could find a new one if you're quick), so if funds are tight that's not an unreasonable option. I can tell you that I have upgraded to the new lens (anyone who wants to buy my 75-300IS...email me!).

Whether the EF 70-200/4 L? USM ($600) or the EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM ($650) is the better buy depends a lot on your application. If you're shooting from a tripod and don't need to zoom to 300mm, the EF 70-200/4L is a very good buy. You can add a Canon 1.4x TC to get to 280mm, though it takes takes time to add and costs around $300. On the other hand if you're shooting handheld and need the ability to easily zoom from 70 to 300mm without stoping to add a TC, then I think the EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM might well turn out to be the better choice.

Where to buy the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM lens

Purchasing the EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 IS USM lens through the following links helps to support photo.net. In our experience Amazon.com offers great service, is trustworthy and has a generous 30 day return policy. They also have excellent partners that offer competitive prices.

FEATURED AMAZON.COM MERCHANTS
Product:
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens for Canon EOS SLR Cameras
List Price:
$649.99
VendorAvailabilityPriceBuy via Amazon
Amazon.com Usually ships in 24 hours$531.35 More info or
Adorama Camera Usually ships in 1-2 business days$549.00 More info or
Calumet Usually ships in 1-2 business days$549.99 More info or
17th Street Photo Usually ships in 1-2 business days$549.00 More info or
J&R Music and Computer World Usually ships in 1-2 business days$549.00 More info or

copyright 2005 Bob Atkins (www.bobatkins.com)

Readers' Comments


Add a comment



David McIntyre , December 03, 2005; 07:41 P.M.

I've had this lens for a few weeks now, and I am very happy with it (bear in mind, though, that I am moving up from the Coolpix 5700). The image stabilization is amazing--even at 300mm, the challenge is in freezing subject movement, not camera movement (and I'm using a Digital Rebel, so the crop factor makes this essentially a 480mm lens). Assuming I have an opportunity to upload images, I will upload a 100% crop of a photo of a chickadee shot at ISO 200, f/7.1, 1/160 sec., 300mm, hand held, sharpened only with the default in-camera sharpening. At 1/160 sec., you can count hairlets on feathers and scales on toes, but the chickadee's head was moving too quickly to freeze. I've managed to capture similar detail down to 1/50 sec. at 300mm with birds that are not moving quite so quickly, and I don't think I have a particularly steady hand.

Image Attachment: 05.12.03-009.web.jpg

Terri L. , March 01, 2006; 11:46 P.M.

Thanks for the many informative reviews - I always read them before deciding on a purchase! I bought a 350D 3 months ago and am building my collection of lenses. Based partly on your recommendations in the article on EOS 300D and 350D lenses, I purchased the 28-135 IS and the 50mm 1.8 (I'm very happy with both). The next purchase was to be a 70-200L, but I wrestle with wondering whether the 200mm would be long enough. I would use this lens mostly for kids football games and some wildlife. After reading this article and a few others, I'm now leaning toward the 70-300IS. Always appreciate your view on these things!

*note: I did buy this lens & I love it. So far it's been used mostly for surfing photos. Haven't seen any problems with the portrait orientation at all.

Wera Mesal , August 24, 2006; 06:20 P.M.

It looks like the sharpness problem with my lens is the result of using it in portrait-orientation. That's the same problem many other people have encountered. This lens is either getting returned to Canon for a refund or I'm selling it because the blurry results are unacceptable. Save yourself the hassle and buy the Canon 70-200mm f/4L instead.

I owned this lens' predecessor, the 75-300mm IS. That lens was horrible. When I read many good things about this new 70-300mm IS lens, I thought it was time to upgrade. But, it was difficult to decide whether buy this lens or Canon's 70-200mm f/4L professional lens. I bought this lens and it was my mistake.

While it has numerous improvements over the 75-300mm IS, there are still some shortcomings with this lens that keep it from competing with the similar-priced 70-200mm f/4L.

First, starting at around 150mm-200mm and getting worse as you approach 300mm, this lens gives images that look soft (no, I'm not using any filters!). This is not an issue of focus, but of low-cost consumer-grade optics. You can stop the lens down and get some improvement, but then you lose your depth of field.

Second, the focusing speed is slow. New in this lens is variable-speed focusing; as the zoom passes 200mm, the focusing speed slows. I assume this is to prevent the missed-focus hunting common with its predecessor. But, this makes it harder to track moving objects and keep them in focus.

Third, this lens suffers from very ugly purple chromatic aberration. This lens really shows this problem too, in that even small bright objects develop purple halos.

Finally, the lens gets larger as you zoom, the lens gets larger when you focus, the front of the lens moves when focusing, the focus ring moves when auto-focusing, the zoom retracts by itself when pointed upward, and I'm sure there's more I'm forgetting... But none of these problems exist with the 70-200mm f/4L.

This is not "the hidden L lens" as one reviewer said, it is nothing but a common consumer lens with a big price tag. The IS feature is the single sole benefit. If you have very shaky hands you might just need this lens. If you have very steady hands, with IS you can use this lens in the dark of night (assuming you have a very still subject). The 200-300mm range is nice, but a tack-sharp photo from the 70-200mm f/4L at 200mm is going to look much better cropped than a 300mm full-frame photo from this lens.

If what you want is a very high quality lens that will give you sharp photos in daylight; buy the 70-200mm f/4L lens instead, it even comes with a hood. The hood for the 70-300mm IS lens is another $40.

Canon EF 70-300/4-5.6 IS USM Review

_

Jason Kulas , March 26, 2007; 08:06 P.M.

>It looks like the sharpness problem with my lens is the result of using it in portrait-orientation.

This is a known problem of certain early versions of this lens. Canon will fix it for free. See these 2 links:
Bob Atkins' 70-300 Lens Review
Canon Service Notice


Add a comment